东汉末年汝南“月旦评”的生成及其评价问题

发布时间：2018-05-09 09:35

本文选题：东汉末年 + 月旦评　；参考：《北京社会科学》2017年08期

【摘要】：东汉末年,许劭、许靖兄弟在汝南主持的"月旦评"轰动一时,它是在政治昏暗和士人清议之风盛行的背景下形成的集会评议活动。评议对象包括各个阶层的人士,以激浊扬清为目的。"月旦评"的产生有着深厚的历史文化原因,此外名士身份的影响力和号召力、评论效果的精准对时人的折服、汉末仰慕名士的浓重风习,都对其有促成作用。因汉末人伦臧否行为会在一定程度上加剧党派矛盾,冒充名士的沽名钓誉之徒也多有存在,故会招致一些地方豪强的抵制。客观看,"月旦评"在世风日下之时的正义呼声及对大量人才的发掘,自有其历史价值所在。虽然许氏兄弟关系不协,自身也有缺陷,但不能据此完全否定"月旦评"及二人厉行荐举人才的功绩。
[Abstract]:At the end of the Eastern Han Dynasty, Xu Shao and Xu Jing's "Moon Day Review", which was presided over in Runan, was a gathering and comment activity formed under the background of the dark politics and the prevailing style of intellectual debate. The review is aimed at people from all walks of life. " There are profound historical and cultural reasons for the creation of Yuetian Review. In addition, the influence and appeal of the celebrity identity, the accuracy of the comment effect to the admiration of the people of the time, and the strong customs of the famous people in the late Han Dynasty have all contributed to it. Because the behavior of Zang Zang in the late Han Dynasty will to a certain extent aggravate the contradiction between the parties, and there are also many people who flaunt famous people, it will cause some local people to resist strongly. From the view of visitors, the appeal of justice and the discovery of a large number of talents have their historical value. Although the Xu brothers do not cooperate with each other and have their own defects, they should not completely deny the merits of the "Moon Day Review" and the two men's efforts to recommend and raise talents.
【作者单位】：青岛大学文学院;
【基金】：青岛市社会科学规划研究项目(QDSKL1601090)
【分类号】：K234.2

【相似文献】