元儒郑玉《春秋》诠释三题——以《春秋阙疑》为中心

发布时间：2018-05-19 21:24

  本文选题：《春秋》 + 阙疑　； 参考：《哲学分析》2017年05期

【摘要】：郑玉的《春秋》诠释以"圣人未修之《春秋》"与"圣人已修之《春秋》"的区分为基础,批评杜预、孔颖达等对《春秋》命名的界说,肯认《春秋》是经非史,客观上构成对朱熹等人所持以史视《春秋》观点的反动。杜预、孔颖达及公羊学家们所持感麟作经故经止获麟的说法,是就《春秋》之形式而言,《春秋》实质上终于黄池之会。他发挥孟子"事"、"文"、"义"之说阐发《春秋》宗旨,以尊王为《春秋》大义之核心,以存理灭欲为《春秋》旨归。在解经方法上,基于对《春秋》经史性质的界定,在以往经学家那里相为b^格的解经方法,在他那里却变得各得其所,相得益彰。
[Abstract]:Zheng Yu's interpretation of "Spring and Autumn" is based on the distinction between "the Sage has not been revised" and "the Sage has been revised", criticizing du Qian and Kong Yingda's definitions of the naming of "Spring and Autumn". Objectively, it constitutes a reaction to the historical view of Zhu Xi et al. Du Qiu, Kong Yingda and ram scientists hold the view that the Scripture and the Meridian get the Lin. In terms of the form of "Spring and Autumn", the "Spring and Autumn" is actually finally a meeting of Huangchi. He gave play to Mencius'"matter", "Wen" and "righteousness" to explain the purpose of "Spring and Autumn", to honor the king as the core of the "Spring and Autumn", and to save reason and destroy desire for the purpose of "Spring and Autumn". On the basis of the definition of the nature of the history of the Spring and Autumn period, the method of solving the Sutra which was regarded as "b ^ lattice" in the past has become different and mutually beneficial to each other.
【作者单位】： 华东师范大学哲学系;
【分类号】：B244.99;K225.04
，

本文编号：1911746