唐代吴令光与王郢史迹探微——王朝政治运作视野下的“海乱”平定史事之考察

发布时间：2018-07-11 14:37

本文选题：唐代 + 吴令光　；参考：《史林》2017年01期

【摘要】：传世文献详尽记载的唐朝"海乱"主要有两起,分别是玄宗天宝年间"海贼"吴令光与僖宗乾符年间的浙东偏将王郢的涉海"叛乱"活动。两次涉海活动,时间间隔百年之久,地域却完全重合,均发生在浙东沿海。这两次"平乱"的相同之处在于借助海域作为活动平台,参与镇压的势力当中地方官军最具实际处事能力;不同的是各自时代背景的差异导致事件走向大不相同,折射出不同背景下的王朝政治运作规律。此外,两次的"平乱"过程当中,无论是朝廷、地方官员、方镇将士或者"作乱"者本身,实际上都有着自己的诉求;特别是参与"平乱"的势力,在共同维护地方秩序的同时,努力实现着自己的权威;因此可谓是各方势力之间的博弈,从当时政治的权力分层运作和兵力部署中就能体现。
[Abstract]:There are two main cases of "sea chaos" recorded in the Tang Dynasty, namely, "sea thief" Wu Linguang and Xi Zong Qianfu in the period of Xuanzong Tianbao and Xi Zong Qianfu. The two sea-related activities occurred on the east coast of Zhejiang Province. The similarities between the two "peaceful disturbances" lie in the fact that, with the help of the sea as a platform of activity, among the forces involved in the suppression, local officials and military forces have the most practical ability to handle affairs; the difference is that the differences in background of their respective times lead to great differences in the course of events. It reflects the law of dynastic political operation in different backgrounds. In addition, during the two "peaceful chaos" processes, whether it was the court, local officials, Fangzhen officers or "rioters" themselves, they actually had their own appeals; especially the forces involved in the "calm chaos". While maintaining the local order together, we strive to realize our own authority; therefore, it is a game between the forces of all parties, which can be reflected in the stratified operation of political power and the deployment of military forces at that time.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学历史学院;
【分类号】：K242

【参考文献】