由北宋农业经济看国家的经济特征
发布时间:2018-07-29 06:02
【摘要】:北宋是一个欣欣向荣的朝代。随着唐代中后期商品经济的恢复和发展,使得土地兼并如洪水猛兽,由此引发贫富分化等连锁反应。这促使国家推行“两税法”来适应经济社会的变化。但它却带来意想不到的后果,其中之一就是土地兼并的加速前进。而“不抑兼并”导致地产集中,由此带来入宋以后富民阶层的崛起。富民阶层由于没有政治特权不得不依靠经济手段维持剥削,这主要通过契约形式实现,最终使得契约租佃入宋以后终成气候。这一历史变迁过程反映了国家传统职能的变迁。本文作者认为,国家在这个过程中不单纯是被迫对经济社会变化做出调整,而是一个辩证的过程。此进程反映出国家的一些经济特征。 本论文分别从这几个方面进行阐述: 第一部分是绪论。这部分阐述文章的选题初衷,即发轫于对导师《两周土地制度新论》及其他论文的思考。由此出发验证,寻找资料的过程也就是该部分中的研究动态所体现出来的。 第二部分是北宋农业经济体现出的特征。该部分就此进行阐述和分析,从分析中抽象出基本理论要素。 第三部分,衔接上一部分思路进行展开。这个部分首先分析处于唐宋变革下国家职能是如何转变的,以及这些转变的外在表现,即“不抑兼并”和“契约租佃制”。进而从这种转变中分析出国家经济利益的职能或者说属性。接下来就国家这种经济利益进行分析,在阐述的过过程尽量将分析框架置于北宋之内,做到理论回归于实践。 第四部分余论。主要就本文逻辑结构进行梳理,最后总结出文章的主旨。
[Abstract]:The Northern Song Dynasty was a thriving dynasty. With the recovery and development of the commodity economy in the middle and late Tang Dynasty, land annexation was like a flood, which led to a chain reaction, such as the polarization between the rich and the poor. This prompted the country to implement the "two tax laws" to adapt to economic and social changes. But it brings unexpected consequences, one of which is the acceleration of land annexation. And "do not suppress merger" leads to the concentration of real estate, which led to the rise of the rich people after the Song Dynasty. The rich people had to rely on economic means to maintain exploitation because they had no political privilege, which was mainly realized by contract form, and finally made the tenancy of contract become the climate after Song Dynasty. This historical change process reflects the change of the traditional function of the country. The author believes that the state is not only forced to adjust the economic and social changes in this process, but a dialectical process. This process reflects some of the country's economic characteristics. This paper separately from these several aspects carries on the elaboration: the first part is the introduction. This part expounds the original intention of this article, that is, the author thinks about the tutor, the New Theory of Land system in two weeks, and other papers. From this point of view, the process of searching for data is reflected by the research dynamics in this part. The second part is the characteristics of agricultural economy in Northern Song Dynasty. In this part, the basic theoretical elements are abstracted from the analysis. The third part, link up part of the train of thought to carry on the development. This part first analyzes how the state functions changed under the transformation of Tang and Song dynasties, as well as the external manifestations of these changes, that is, "not restraining mergers" and "contractual tenancy system". Then analyze the function or attribute of national economic interest from this kind of transformation. Then the economic interests of the state are analyzed, and the analysis framework is put into the Northern Song Dynasty as far as possible in the process of elaboration, so as to return the theory to practice. The fourth part is the conclusion. This paper mainly combed the logical structure, and finally summed up the main purpose of the article.
【学位授予单位】:陕西师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:K244;F329
本文编号:2151759
[Abstract]:The Northern Song Dynasty was a thriving dynasty. With the recovery and development of the commodity economy in the middle and late Tang Dynasty, land annexation was like a flood, which led to a chain reaction, such as the polarization between the rich and the poor. This prompted the country to implement the "two tax laws" to adapt to economic and social changes. But it brings unexpected consequences, one of which is the acceleration of land annexation. And "do not suppress merger" leads to the concentration of real estate, which led to the rise of the rich people after the Song Dynasty. The rich people had to rely on economic means to maintain exploitation because they had no political privilege, which was mainly realized by contract form, and finally made the tenancy of contract become the climate after Song Dynasty. This historical change process reflects the change of the traditional function of the country. The author believes that the state is not only forced to adjust the economic and social changes in this process, but a dialectical process. This process reflects some of the country's economic characteristics. This paper separately from these several aspects carries on the elaboration: the first part is the introduction. This part expounds the original intention of this article, that is, the author thinks about the tutor, the New Theory of Land system in two weeks, and other papers. From this point of view, the process of searching for data is reflected by the research dynamics in this part. The second part is the characteristics of agricultural economy in Northern Song Dynasty. In this part, the basic theoretical elements are abstracted from the analysis. The third part, link up part of the train of thought to carry on the development. This part first analyzes how the state functions changed under the transformation of Tang and Song dynasties, as well as the external manifestations of these changes, that is, "not restraining mergers" and "contractual tenancy system". Then analyze the function or attribute of national economic interest from this kind of transformation. Then the economic interests of the state are analyzed, and the analysis framework is put into the Northern Song Dynasty as far as possible in the process of elaboration, so as to return the theory to practice. The fourth part is the conclusion. This paper mainly combed the logical structure, and finally summed up the main purpose of the article.
【学位授予单位】:陕西师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:K244;F329
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王f ;;传统中国社会中租佃制度对产出的作用分析——基于德怀特·希·帕金斯视角的研究[J];财经研究;2006年03期
2 林文勋;商品经济与唐宋社会变革[J];中国经济史研究;2004年01期
3 霍存福;论中国古代契约与国家法的关系——以唐代法律与借贷契约的关系为中心[J];当代法学;2005年01期
4 吴承明;研究经济史的一些体会[J];近代史研究;2005年03期
5 马兴东;宋代“不立田制”问题试析[J];史学月刊;1990年06期
6 柴荣;透视宋代的土地兼并问题[J];西南民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2003年01期
7 于干千;;基于博弈论的“不抑兼并”土地制度分析——以唐宋农地制度的演进为视角[J];中国经济史研究;2007年01期
8 杨际平;;宋代“田制不立”、“不抑兼并”说驳议[J];中国社会经济史研究;2006年02期
9 柴荣;透视宋代土地租佃制度——对宋代土地经营过程有关法律问题的思考[J];内蒙古大学学报(人文.社会科学版);2003年03期
10 谢元鲁;对唐宋社会经济制度变迁的再思考[J];中国经济史研究;2005年02期
,本文编号:2151759
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgtslw/2151759.html