明清以来晋水流域的武氏宗族与地域社会

发布时间：2018-08-24 13:14

【摘要】：依据武氏族谱的相关记载可知,武氏兄弟于明初打着“应诏”的旗号,以“洪洞大槐树”移民的身份进入了位于晋水流域的北大寺村。发展壮大到一定程度后,武氏族人在地域社会内部进行了一系列实体宗族建构活动且进行了“分股”。明清以来,武氏通过宗族力量,最终将灌溉北大寺村田地的“公共之河”变为了“宗族之河”,展现了其在晋水流域的宗族势力。新中国成立以后,武氏宗族经历了“解构”的历史时期,宗族在组织形态上基本被摧毁,但是在日常生活中,宗族观念与文化的影响普遍存在而且突出。改革开放以来,武氏加入了宗族“复兴”的浪潮并进行了重新建构,在此期间,外迁族人实现了“认祖归宗”的夙愿。以明清以来晋水流域的武氏宗族为研究个案,运用多学科的理论与方法,通过探讨宗族自身发生、发展的历史过程;宗族与水利的关系以及宗族在新时期进行的“复兴”、“联宗”和“合族”等问题的相关研究,得出了如下结论:首先,关于“水利与宗族”两者之间关系的重新界定:作为地域社会发展中的两个要素,宗族与水利在其各自经历的发展历程中,原本没有太大的关联,而是处于一种“各行其道”的状态中。二者出现的交叉是发生在特定历史条件成熟的前提下。当历史条件发生变化时,两者回归到了之前的状态,转而“各奔前程”。其次,关于新时期宗族进行“复兴”、“联宗”以及“合族”问题的研究结论:宗族在村庄治理中的不干涉行为,使得族人对宗族的认同遭遇危机,为宗族走向“复兴”提供了重要的思想背景。当前进行的宗族复兴活动,多体现在文化层面,是人们“归属感”的一种深层次的展现。新时期武氏外迁族人的回归,在学术上应该被界定为“合族”行为。而关于宗族之间交往关系的性质,也许是其走向联宗结果的一个开始,但目前的发展阶段并不是真正学术意义上的“联宗”行为。
[Abstract]:According to the relevant records of Wu's genealogy, the brothers entered the village of Peking Temple in Jinshui Valley in the early Ming Dynasty under the banner of "should Zhao" as immigrants of "Hongdong Big Sophora Tree". After developing to a certain extent, the Wu clan carried on a series of entity clan construction activities and carried on the "share division" in the regional society. Since the Ming and Qing dynasties, through clan power, Wu finally changed the "River of Public", which irrigated the fields of Beidabi village, into a "river of clan", showing his clan influence in the water basin of Jin Dynasty. After the founding of New China, the Wu clan experienced the historical period of "deconstruction", the clan was basically destroyed in the form of organization, but in daily life, the influence of clan concept and culture was widespread and prominent. Since the reform and opening up, Wu joined the wave of clan "rejuvenation" and re-constructed. During this period, the foreign people realized the long-cherished wish of "recognizing their ancestors and returning their ancestors." Taking the Wu clan in the Jinshui River basin since the Ming and Qing dynasties as a case study, using multi-disciplinary theories and methods, this paper discusses the historical process of the clan's own occurrence and development, the relationship between the clan and water conservancy, and the "rejuvenation" of the clan in the new period. The relevant studies on the problems of "Lianzong" and "United clan" have drawn the following conclusions: first, the redefinition of the relationship between "water conservancy and clan": as two elements in the development of regional society, The clan and water conservancy had no great relation in their respective development process, but were in a state of "going their own way". The crossover between the two occurs on the premise of the maturity of specific historical conditions. When historical conditions change, the two return to their previous state, and instead "go their own way." Secondly, the conclusion of the research on the "rejuvenation", "joint clan" and "United clan" in the new period: the non-interference behavior of clan in village governance makes the clan identity encounter a crisis. It provides an important ideological background for the clan to "rejuvenate". The current activities of clan rejuvenation, mostly reflected in the cultural level, are a deep manifestation of people's "sense of belonging". In the new period, the return of Wu's emigrants should be defined as "joint clan" behavior academically. The nature of the relationship between clans may be the beginning of the result of the association, but the present stage of development is not the real academic behavior of "joint clan".
【学位授予单位】：山西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：K248

【参考文献】