海外汉学成果译介与学术批评机制的建构——由平势隆郎《从城市国家到中华》的译介及其内容误谬说起

发布时间：2018-02-10 15:09

本文关键词： 平势隆郎《春秋》纪年东京文献学派　出处：《齐鲁学刊》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：日本学者平势隆郎所著《从城市国家到中华:殷周春秋战国》一书,随着讲谈社《中国的历史》丛书的编译出版而在中国学界广为流传。该书在基本史实上存在着诸多讹舛,学术观念颇多谬误,例如判断《春秋》一书修成于战国时代,是田齐政权为了自己的政治利益而纂修,而《左传》是韩国为反击齐国而作等,荒唐离奇,了无实据。这些谬误源于作者对中国先秦君主纪年体系和演变的偏执认识,表现于作者的《新编史记东周纪年》一书。海外汉学成果的译介对中国学术界非常必要和重要,但引介的同时还应有相应的批评跟进,一方面通过正常健全的学术批评增进对相关成果的关注和理解,另一方面通过批评及时指出其中一些明显谬误,防止对中国学界尤其是初学者的误导和淆乱。
[Abstract]:The book "from the City State to China: the Spring and Autumn warring States of Yin and Zhou dynasties" by Japanese scholar Hirahiro has been widely circulated in Chinese academic circles with the compilation and publication of the "History of China" series. There are many errors in the basic historical facts of the book. There are quite a lot of fallacies in academic ideas, such as judging that the book "Spring and Autumn" was revised in the warring States period, and that it was the Tianqi regime that compiled it for its own political interests, while the "Zuo Zhuan" was written by South Korea in order to counter Qi, and so on. It was absurd and strange. These fallacies stem from the author's paranoid understanding of the chronological system and evolution of the Chinese pre-Qin monarch, and are manifested in the author's book the New History of the Eastern Zhou Chronicle. The translation and introduction of overseas Sinological achievements is very necessary and important to the Chinese academic community. However, the introduction should be accompanied by corresponding criticism. On the one hand, through normal and sound academic criticism, we should increase our concern and understanding of the relevant achievements; on the other hand, we should point out some obvious fallacies through criticism in a timely manner. To prevent the misdirection and confusion of the Chinese academic circles, especially the beginners.
【作者单位】：廊坊师范学院社会发展学院;
【分类号】：K207.8

【相似文献】