周代“籍礼”补议——兼说商代无“籍田”及“籍礼”

发布时间：2018-02-12 19:39

  本文关键词： 籍礼 帝籍 籍田千亩　出处：《中国史研究》2016年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：由清华简《系年》对"帝饮"的论述看,周代设"籍田"、行"籍礼"是谋取政权合法性的重大举措。"帝籍"一语,强调籍田专属礼神的功能特征,而"王籍"又表明天子在籍田礼活动中的躬亲而为和主导性。周之籍田当在都城南郊,"千亩"仅指其规模,将其混同于晋之"千亩"是错误的。甲骨文"糟"字仅指实际的耕作活动,从地点、时间及商王在其中的作用看,均与周代籍田、籍礼的一些基本特征不合。因此,商代并无"籍田"及"籍礼",它们应该是商周因革之际周人的制度创造。
[Abstract]:From the exposition of Qing Hua Bamboo slips on "imperial drink", it is an important measure to seek the legitimacy of political power to set up a "register field" in the Zhou Dynasty. The term "imperial nationality" emphasizes the functional characteristics of the special ritual god of Tian. However, "Wang Ji" also shows that the son of Heaven is the dominant and relative person in the activities of Tian Li. Zhou Zhitian should be on the southern outskirts of the capital city, and "thousand mu" refers only to its scale. It is wrong to mix it with the "thousand mu" of the Jin Dynasty. The word "bad" in oracle bone inscription only refers to actual farming activities. In terms of location, time and the role of the Shang king in it, it is incompatible with some basic characteristics of the Zhou-dynasty nationality field and the ritual. There was no "land" and "ritual" in Shang Dynasty, which should be created by Zhou people in the period of Shang and Zhou dynasties.
【作者单位】： 上海大学历史系;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“中国国家起源研究的理论与方法”(项目号12&ZD133)阶段性成果
【分类号】：K877.5
，

本文编号：1506399