从《新青年》“共和”观念变迁看五四话语分歧

发布时间：2018-04-02 23:01

本文选题：《新青年》　切入点：五四　出处：《社会科学战线》2016年03期

【摘要】：依据"文学史"与"政治史"对五四审视的两种视域,可以把五四具体区分为"政治五四"与"文化五四",虽然二者常因具有相对于"消极无效"的"共和"政治实践的"进取精神"和"创造素质"而被视为价值共同体,却有着不同的价值观念,这在《新青年》"共和话语"流变中显得较为醒目。作为思想运动的"文化五四"是以共和的政治危机为主要背景的,其中心内容是民族文化的选择与重构,但根本落脚点却是借助纠正文化与制度的错位来激活制度活力并使之发挥最大功效。相对于前期《新青年》致力于名不副实的共和制不健全的后天功能的修复的文化努力,后期《新青年》则更多将共和制度视为先天不全的必然被替代的历史淘汰物。在一定程度上,"文化差异性"是二者分歧的表征,"制度的竞争性"才是分歧的根本。
[Abstract]:According to the two horizons of the May fourth Movement, which are examined by the History of Literature and the History of Politics,The May fourth Movement can be divided into "political May fourth Movement" and "Cultural May fourth Movement", although they are often regarded as value communities because of their "enterprising spirit" and "creative quality" in relation to "negative and invalid" political practice.However, it has different values, which is obvious in the evolution of Republican discourse.As an ideological movement, the May 4th Movement of Culture is based on the Republican political crisis, the central content of which is the selection and reconstruction of national culture.But the fundamental goal is to activate the institutional vitality and make it exert its maximum effect by correcting the dislocation of culture and institution.Compared with the cultural efforts in the early period of the "New Youth" devoted to the restoration of the defective and acquired functions of the Republican system, the late "New Youth" regarded the Republican system as the inevitable historical elimination which must be replaced by the congenital incompleteness.To a certain extent, the cultural difference is the symbol of the difference between the two, and the competition of the system is the root of the difference.
【作者单位】：吉林大学文学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目(15BZW127)
【分类号】：K203;I206.6

【相似文献】