论余英时文化史观的三维向度

发布时间：2018-05-10 18:49

本文选题：余英时 + 儒家文化史观　；参考：《晋中学院学报》2015年01期

【摘要】：余英时的文化史观大体可以分为儒家文化史观、政治文化史观以及人类文化史观三个方面。就儒家文化史观来说,"哲学的突破"、"士"的起源与发展以及"心"乃价值之源等构成了余英时先秦儒家文化史观的主要内容,明清儒学思想基调的转换与晚清儒学的内在批判构成了余英时明清儒家文化史观的主要内容,儒学非正统、反传统成分以及"整理国故"运动则构成了余英时五四文化史观的主要内容;就政治文化史观来说,通过"士志于道"、"人皆可以为尧舜"等名言警句,余英时论述了中国古代民主政治思想的支撑点。就人类文化史观来说,余英时对人文与科学的新研究与新思考充分展现了其博大人类情怀。纵观余英时文化史观,我们不难发现其儒家文化史观具有理性、政治文化史观具有理想性、人类文化史观具有独特性等特点。
[Abstract]:Yu Yingshi's view of cultural history can be divided into three aspects: Confucian cultural historical view, political cultural historical view and human cultural historical view. As far as the Confucian cultural historical view is concerned, "the breakthrough of philosophy", the origin and development of "scholar" and the source of value constitute the main content of Yu Ying's Confucian cultural historical view of pre-Qin period. The change of the tone of Confucianism in the Ming and Qing dynasties and the inner criticism of Confucianism in the late Qing Dynasty constituted the main content of the Confucian cultural and historical views of Yu Ying and Ming and Qing dynasties, and Confucianism was not orthodox. The anti-traditional elements and the movement of "sorting out the national heritage" formed the main content of Yu Yingshi's May 4th cultural historical view. As far as the political and cultural historical view is concerned, with regard to the historical view of political culture, through the famous aphorisms, "all people can serve as Yao and Shun," and other famous sayings, "people can all serve as Yao and Shun". Yu Yingshi discussed the support point of Chinese ancient democratic political thought. As far as the view of human culture is concerned, Yu Yingshi's new research and new thinking on humanities and science fully show his extensive human feelings. Looking at Yu Yingshi's view of cultural history, it is not difficult to find that his Confucian view of cultural history is rational, the view of political cultural history is ideal, and the view of human cultural history is unique.
【作者单位】：青岛大学政治学院;北京师范大学马克思主义学院;
【分类号】：K203

【参考文献】