北京大学与新文化运动

发布时间：2018-07-11 18:33

本文选题：北京大学 + 新文化运动　；参考：《中山大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年05期

【摘要】：由于陈独秀被捕入狱、胡适态度保留,其他人关注重心转移,主办《新青年》的北京大学教授群体,对于五四以后兴起的新文化运动较为疏离。而在蔡元培等人回归常态的要求下,北大学生也显得相对静默。陈独秀出狱后,敏锐地把握到新文化运动的巨大潜力,连续撰文演讲,迅速加入新文化运动的行列,并且很快跃升到中坚和领袖的地位。胡适对于新文化运动社会性普及的一面不以为然,后来则逐渐模糊五四前后新思潮运动与新文化运动的关系。新思潮与新文化之间存在的事实联系,也使得参与甚至异议新文化运动者将二者混为一谈。历史上的新文化运动与新文化运动的历史叙述因此出现混淆。
[Abstract]:Due to Chen Duxiu's arrest, Hu Shi's attitude and others' attention to the shift of focus, the group of Peking University professors who hosted the New Youth was more alienated from the new cultural movement that began after the May 4th Movement. Under the request of Cai Yuanpei and others to return to normal, Peking University students also appear relatively silent. After Chen Duxiu was released from prison, he acutely grasped the great potential of the New Culture Movement, wrote a series of speeches, quickly joined the ranks of the New Culture Movement, and quickly rose to the position of backbone and leader. Hu Shi disagrees with the sociality of the New Cultural Movement, and later obscures the relationship between the New ideological Movement and the New Cultural Movement before and after the May 4th Movement. The fact relation between the new trend of thought and the new culture also causes the people who participate in or even disagree with the new culture movement to confuse the two. As a result, the historical narration of the New Cultural Movement and the New Cultural Movement is confused.
【作者单位】：中山大学历史学系;
【基金】：中山大学“三大建设”专项资助
【分类号】：K203

【相似文献】