图像、丛生与间性——探源中国哲学的新路径
发布时间：2018-08-06 17:43
【摘要】：孟旦在其中国古典哲学研究中,创造性地运用了“图像”和“丛生”这两个概念。基于这两个概念的解释方案,不但适于展示中国哲学之特质,而且较之当代西方哲学中诸如隐喻、诗化哲学、图像修辞、异延等众说纷纭的新尝试更为简朴,在哲学上具有进一步开发和提炼的前景。实际上,“图像”和“丛生”概念所揭示或反映的,不是传统西方哲学意义上的实体或本体,而是“间性(interality)”,亦即非实体的现实。尽管在早期文献里找不到专论间或间性的例证,似乎也没有将间性抽象为哲学范畴的明确努力,但是“间”字在古典文献中的使用却绝不罕见。如何认识和对待现前的间性状态,如何遵循和建设理想的间性条件,实为古典中国哲学的核心关注。正是蕴含在“图像”及“丛生”概念中的间性(论)视角,使得中国先哲发展出了一种不同于西方的哲学路径与话语系统。
[Abstract]:Meng Dan creatively applied the concepts of "image" and "cluster" in his study of Chinese classical philosophy. The interpretation scheme based on these two concepts is not only suitable for displaying the characteristics of Chinese philosophy, but also more simple than the new attempts of contemporary western philosophy such as metaphor, poetic philosophy, image rhetoric, different extension and so on. It has the prospect of further development and refinement in philosophy. In fact, the concepts of "image" and "cluster" reveal or reflect not the entity or ontology in the sense of traditional western philosophy, but the "inter-entity (interality)", that is, the reality of non-entity. Although there are no examples of intermonism or interiority in the early literature and no explicit efforts to abstract intersubjectivity into philosophical categories, the use of the word "interspace" in classical literature is by no means rare. It is the core concern of classical Chinese philosophy that how to understand and deal with the present state of intersex and how to follow and construct the ideal condition of intersex. It is the interfacial perspective contained in the concepts of "image" and "cluster" that makes Chinese sages develop a philosophical path and discourse system different from that of the West.
，
本文编号：2168494
[Abstract]:Meng Dan creatively applied the concepts of "image" and "cluster" in his study of Chinese classical philosophy. The interpretation scheme based on these two concepts is not only suitable for displaying the characteristics of Chinese philosophy, but also more simple than the new attempts of contemporary western philosophy such as metaphor, poetic philosophy, image rhetoric, different extension and so on. It has the prospect of further development and refinement in philosophy. In fact, the concepts of "image" and "cluster" reveal or reflect not the entity or ontology in the sense of traditional western philosophy, but the "inter-entity (interality)", that is, the reality of non-entity. Although there are no examples of intermonism or interiority in the early literature and no explicit efforts to abstract intersubjectivity into philosophical categories, the use of the word "interspace" in classical literature is by no means rare. It is the core concern of classical Chinese philosophy that how to understand and deal with the present state of intersex and how to follow and construct the ideal condition of intersex. It is the interfacial perspective contained in the concepts of "image" and "cluster" that makes Chinese sages develop a philosophical path and discourse system different from that of the West.
，
本文编号：2168494
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhongguolishiwenhua/2168494.html
