新文化的南北之争——重新认识新文化运动的复杂面相

发布时间：2018-09-02 08:02

【摘要】：当年以梅光迪、吴宓、柳诒徵、张荫麟等学者为中坚,反对激进的新文化运动的人文学者,以东南大学为基地,创办《学衡》杂志与以北大为中心的新文化运动者争锋,俨然是一场民国学术界的南北战争。双方从文言与白话、尊孔与反孔、浪漫与古典等方面进行激烈交锋,最后北全胜而南惨败。其实,南方新文化运动学者明言"昌明国粹,融化新知",并不反对新文化,他们所主张的"新人文主义"就是舶来品,也是一种新文化,只是他们所要汲取的新文化,有异于陈独秀、胡适。他们对新文化的态度也不相同,不要"拿来",而要"融化"。百年后的今日,重估新文化运动的遗产,应认知到北方新文化运动遗产的负面后果。而南方新文化运动无端被视为反新文化、泥古守旧而被弃之,殊多遗憾。应当彻底回顾,检讨得失,才能打通中西,融合古今,以重构21世纪的中国思想文化之图谱。
[Abstract]:At that time, scholars such as Mei Guangdi, Wu Mi, Liu Yizheng and Zhang Yin-lin were the backbone, humanities scholars opposed to the radical new cultural movement, and based on Southeast University, they started the "Xueheng" magazine and contended with the New Culture Movement centered on Peking University. It was like a civil war in the Republic of China. The two sides fought fiercely from classical Chinese and vernacular, from respect to Confucius and anti-hole, romantic and classical, and finally won in the north and defeated in the south. As a matter of fact, the Southern New Culture Movement scholars said explicitly that "the essence of the nation will flourish and melt the new knowledge." they are not opposed to the new culture. The "new humanism" they advocate is an import and a new culture. It is just the new culture they want to absorb. There are different from Chen Duxiu, Hu Shi. Their attitude to the new culture is different, not "bring it", but "melt". A hundred years later, revaluating the heritage of the New Cultural Movement should recognize the negative consequences of the New Cultural Movement in the North. However, the Southern New Culture Movement was regarded as anti-new culture for no reason. We should thoroughly review the gains and losses in order to open up China and the West, integrate the ancient and modern, and reconstruct the map of Chinese ideology and culture in the 21st century.
【作者单位】：中央研究院近代史研究所;
【分类号】：K203

【共引文献】