李庄罗南陔欢迎同济十六字“电文”质疑
发布时间：2018-09-03 13:26
【摘要】：十六字电文"同大迁川,李庄欢迎,一切需要,地方供给",既非源于任何历史档案,也与"电文"接收方同济师生的李庄追忆无关,却出自舛误颇多的李庄内部印刷品"李清泉遗稿",而如今原件已不翼而飞。即便"遗稿"属真,也是孤证无凭,只能存疑。未经确证的"电文"被层层放大,移花接木地书写和表演成"罗南陔起草",漏洞百出,不宜当作纪实物件来呈现历史,更不应作为李庄的历史文献来复制,干扰史书的撰述,以讹传讹。虽然十六字"电文"与"罗南陔起草"之说均有作伪之嫌,罗氏与李庄士绅对同济与中研院等的友情支持却是真实存在,完全可从现存资料中遴选真实字句,重现真情。当年农协会主席的政治权力之任性摧毁了罗南陔的肉身,今日历史叙事者的话语权力之任性却容易扰乱他的天国之魂。
[Abstract]:The 16-character message "with the great move to Sichuan, Li Zhuang welcomes, all needs, local supplies" is neither derived from any historical archives, nor does it have anything to do with the recollection of Li Zhuang, who receives the message from teachers and students. But from the ill-fated Li Zhuang internal printing, "Li Qingquan manuscript," and now the original has disappeared. Even if the "manuscript" is true, but also isolated evidence, can only doubt. The uncorroborated "message" was magnified layer by layer, and it was written and performed in a piecemeal manner as "Luo Nan drafted it," which was full of flaws. It should not be regarded as a documentary object to present history, nor should it be copied as a historical document of Li Zhuang to interfere with the compilation of historical books. circulate erroneous reports Although both the "message" with sixteen characters and the "draft by Luo Nan" are suspected of being false, the friendship support of Luo and Li Zhuang gentry to Tongji and the Academia Sinica is real, and the true words and phrases can be selected from the existing materials to reproduce the true feelings. The capricious political power of the chairman of the peasant association destroyed the flesh of Luo Nanying, but the wayward nature of the discourse power of the narrator of modern history easily disturbed the soul of his kingdom of heaven.
【作者单位】： 香港浸会大学历史系近代中国研究中心;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金“民国政党政治的勃兴与困境”(项目编号:15BZS094)
【分类号】：K207
本文编号：2220102
[Abstract]:The 16-character message "with the great move to Sichuan, Li Zhuang welcomes, all needs, local supplies" is neither derived from any historical archives, nor does it have anything to do with the recollection of Li Zhuang, who receives the message from teachers and students. But from the ill-fated Li Zhuang internal printing, "Li Qingquan manuscript," and now the original has disappeared. Even if the "manuscript" is true, but also isolated evidence, can only doubt. The uncorroborated "message" was magnified layer by layer, and it was written and performed in a piecemeal manner as "Luo Nan drafted it," which was full of flaws. It should not be regarded as a documentary object to present history, nor should it be copied as a historical document of Li Zhuang to interfere with the compilation of historical books. circulate erroneous reports Although both the "message" with sixteen characters and the "draft by Luo Nan" are suspected of being false, the friendship support of Luo and Li Zhuang gentry to Tongji and the Academia Sinica is real, and the true words and phrases can be selected from the existing materials to reproduce the true feelings. The capricious political power of the chairman of the peasant association destroyed the flesh of Luo Nanying, but the wayward nature of the discourse power of the narrator of modern history easily disturbed the soul of his kingdom of heaven.
【作者单位】： 香港浸会大学历史系近代中国研究中心;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金“民国政党政治的勃兴与困境”(项目编号:15BZS094)
【分类号】：K207
【参考文献】
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 岱峻;;世界，将重新叩访李庄[N];四川政协报;2000年
，本文编号：2220102
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhongguolishiwenhua/2220102.html
