《史籍考》编纂始末辨析

发布时间：2019-02-26 13:24

【摘要】：作为中国古代传统学术的总结期,清乾嘉道时期诸儒对经史、小学的缜密考辨和编纂,孕育出《皇清经解》、《史籍考》、《小学考》等颇具宏观性的集大成巨作。与《皇清经解》、《小学考》流传至今而大显于世的命运不同,《史籍考》则因遭兵火之厄而消失于天壤间,隐而不彰。然而,毕沅、谢启昆、潘锡恩之主持经营,章学诚、胡虔、许瀚诸人之汲汲编纂,无不彰显出学人及地方大吏对史学的关注和倡导。因此,梳理和考辨《史籍考》的编纂经过,以及其取向、构架和成就,于深入考察乾嘉道时期的史学趋向不无裨益。
[Abstract]:As the summation period of Chinese traditional academic, the history of Confucian classics, the meticulous examination and compilation of elementary schools in the period of Qing-Qian, Jiaodao and Daoism, gave birth to some macro-works, such as the interpretation of Huangqing's classics, the examination of historical books, and the examination of elementary schools. Different from Huang Qing Jing Jie, the Primary School examination has been handed down to this day and the fate of the world, but because of the military fire, the disappearance of the earth, hidden and not prominent. However, the management of Bi Yuan, Xie Qikun and Pan Sien, Zhang Xuecheng, Hu Qian and Xu Han all showed the concern and advocacy of historiography by scholars and local officials. Therefore, it is helpful to review the historical trend of Qianjiadao period by sorting out and distinguishing the compilation process, orientation, structure and achievement of the Historical Records of the Qianjiadao period.
【作者单位】：
【分类号】：K206
，

本文编号：2430812