敦煌伯3813唐判与宋代花判
发布时间：2019-05-10 18:45
【摘要】：敦煌文献伯3813所录唐代判词中,有数则判词与存世唐判如《龙筋凤髓判》等相比较都有明显的差异。其叙事均稍为繁复、滑稽戏谑的特征明显。上述特点显示伯3813唐判中部分判词已经开始偏离"临政治民"的功能,而逐渐带有世俗化与娱乐化的倾向。这些判词与南宋学者洪迈《容斋随笔》所述"世俗喜道琐屑遗事,参以滑稽,目为花判"的特点相近。就文体渊源而言,敦煌伯3813唐判中部分判词虽无"花判"之名,却基本具备了后世花判的主要特点,实为宋代花判之滥觞。
[Abstract]:In the Tang Dynasty judgments recorded by Dunhuang document Bo 3813, there are obvious differences between several judgments and those recorded in Tang Dynasty, such as Longjin Fengdi judgment. Its narration is a little complicated, and the funny and playful characteristics are obvious. The above characteristics show that some of the judgments in Bo 3813 Tang Dynasty judgment have begun to deviate from the function of "facing the political people", and gradually have the tendency of secularization and entertainment. These judgments are similar to those described by Hongmai Rong Zhai, a scholar in the Southern Song Dynasty, as follows: "the trivial legacy of worldly joy road is funny and the purpose of flower judgment is flower judgment". As far as the stylistic origin is concerned, although some of the judgments in Tang Dynasty in Dunhuang Bo 3813 did not have the name of "flower judgment", they basically had the main characteristics of flower judgment in later generations, which was the origin of flower judgment in Song Dynasty.
【作者单位】： 西南交通大学人文学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究西部和边疆地区规划基金项目“宋代骈文文体功能研究”(11XJA751004) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目“唐宋古文运动背景下苏轼骈文研究”(SWJTU11CX108)
【分类号】：K242;K244
本文编号：2473910
[Abstract]:In the Tang Dynasty judgments recorded by Dunhuang document Bo 3813, there are obvious differences between several judgments and those recorded in Tang Dynasty, such as Longjin Fengdi judgment. Its narration is a little complicated, and the funny and playful characteristics are obvious. The above characteristics show that some of the judgments in Bo 3813 Tang Dynasty judgment have begun to deviate from the function of "facing the political people", and gradually have the tendency of secularization and entertainment. These judgments are similar to those described by Hongmai Rong Zhai, a scholar in the Southern Song Dynasty, as follows: "the trivial legacy of worldly joy road is funny and the purpose of flower judgment is flower judgment". As far as the stylistic origin is concerned, although some of the judgments in Tang Dynasty in Dunhuang Bo 3813 did not have the name of "flower judgment", they basically had the main characteristics of flower judgment in later generations, which was the origin of flower judgment in Song Dynasty.
【作者单位】： 西南交通大学人文学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究西部和边疆地区规划基金项目“宋代骈文文体功能研究”(11XJA751004) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目“唐宋古文运动背景下苏轼骈文研究”(SWJTU11CX108)
【分类号】：K242;K244
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 张建成;;明清“花判”的艺术特点[J];新闻爱好者;2009年16期
，本文编号：2473910
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhongguolishiwenhua/2473910.html
