先秦君子观念研究
[Abstract]:The concept of gentleman, which originated in the pre-Qin period, is of great significance in the development of Chinese traditional culture. Under the background of the reform of state and social system in Yin and Zhou dynasties, the original concepts of "monarch" and "son" gradually confluent. "Jun-Zi", as a new compound concept, came into being and became an accurate concept describing the unique identity of the heir of Shang king under the early patriarchal system. The early meaning of the concept of "gentleman" in the existing literature was also born in this logical process. Then, with the leap of humanistic spirit in Yin and Zhou dynasties, including the concepts of "gentleman" and related concepts such as "heaven" and "virtue", they all experienced key changes in meaning. At the same time, the concepts of "heaven" and "gentleman" are gradually related to the abstract "virtue", which promotes the extension of the meaning of "gentleman" from "position" to "virtue". At the same time, the concept of gentleman has a series of connections with the natural images such as Jinyu landscape through internal and external clues, one is to connect with the ancient jade culture through the theory of destiny, and the other is to connect with the unique aesthetic taste of ancient China, the natural thing "Bede". In the Western Zhou Dynasty, class factors occupied a place in the concept of gentleman for a long time, until Confucius and his subsequent thinkers completely transformed this situation through their philosophical breakthrough in the relationship between heaven and man. Although the sons of "the way of the gentleman" were invented after the "axial breakthrough", the pursuit of "Tao" is still the consensus inherited from the cultural traditions of the three generations. Among them, it is worth noting that the Confucian "gentleman" and the "sage" in the higher realm are the important characteristics of "teacher" and the philosophical significance of the birth of the concept of "sage".
【学位授予单位】:河北大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:K22
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘景挹;;古代帝王宣扬“天命论”系欺骗一说之异议[J];湖南师范大学社会科学学报;1987年03期
2 乔根锁;西周天命论与中国古代哲学的发生[J];西藏民族学院学报(社会科学版);1988年Z1期
3 廖名春;上博《诗论》简的天命论和“诚”论[J];哲学研究;2002年09期
4 覃茂福;从灵渠的开凿看“天命论”的破产[J];广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1974年05期
5 成都无缝钢管厂《刘禹锡诗选》编辑小组 ,四川师中文系《刘禹锡诗选》编辑小组;反“天命论”的战斗诗篇——读刘禹锡《有獭吟》[J];四川师范学院学报(社会科学版);1975年02期
6 赵丽;;《死者年鉴》中美国“天命论”的瓦解[J];沈阳师范大学学报(社会科学版);2013年02期
7 胡同彰,王大木,余中兴;不信“天命” 大干革命[J];武汉师院;1974年03期
8 杨国荣;外在天命与主体自由的二难困境——理学对力命关系的考察及其内蕴[J];福建论坛(文史哲版);1993年01期
9 唐兆梅;论宋代史学家的“反天命”思想[J];河北学刊;1993年04期
10 赵源一;;韩愈的天命论探微[J];船山学刊;2007年01期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 金池;孔子不信“天命鬼神”[N];吉林日报;2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 红艳;成吉思汗人生观研究[D];内蒙古师范大学;2015年
2 周学熙;先秦君子观念研究[D];河北大学;2016年
,本文编号:2501908
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhongguolishiwenhua/2501908.html