环境侵权类型的重构

发布时间：2018-01-07 07:43

本文关键词：环境侵权类型的重构　出处：《中国法学》2017年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：目前关于环境侵权类型的认识难以适应实践的需求。这很大程度上源于环境侵权的类型化只注重理论演绎,而忽略了立基于实践,从司法判例中寻找素材。环境侵权的类型化应以法条和判决为基础,考察"侵害"和"权益"在具体案件中的表现,据此确定实证法中的类型。环境侵权的类型化不同于普通民事侵权,不仅要体现侵害行为的不同,更要体现公益与私益的差别。环境侵权案件应分为三类,即环境污染侵害个人私益的纠纷、环境污染或生态破坏侵害环境公益的纠纷、环境污染或生态破坏侵害个人私益与环境公益的纠纷。对不同类型案件的裁判应当根据各自的特性适用不同的处理规则。由于环境侵权案件类型的复杂性,环境司法应当专门化。
[Abstract]:At present, the understanding of environmental tort types is difficult to adapt to the needs of practice. To a large extent, this is due to the fact that the typology of environmental tort only pays attention to theoretical deduction, while neglecting the establishment based on practice. The classification of environmental tort should be based on the articles of law and judgment to investigate the performance of "infringement" and "rights and interests" in specific cases. The classification of environmental tort is different from ordinary civil tort. It should not only reflect the difference of infringement behavior, but also reflect the difference between public interest and private benefit. Environmental tort cases should be divided into three categories. That is, environmental pollution infringes on personal interests, environmental pollution or ecological destruction of environmental public welfare disputes. Environmental pollution or ecological damage infringes the disputes between private interests and environmental public welfare. The adjudication of different types of cases should apply different rules according to their own characteristics. Because of the complexity of environmental infringement cases. Environmental justice should be specialized.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院法学研究所;
【分类号】：D922.68;D925.1
【正文快照】： 确定案件的类型是法院进行裁判的前提,这关系到请求权的正确适用以及法律关系的妥当处理。然而,在当下的司法实践中,环境侵权案件的类型化现状难以满足案件妥当裁判的需求。现行适用的民事案由对环境侵权案件的分类无法起到准确指引和区分处理的作用,法官要么虚置不用,要么无

【参考文献】