环境公益诉讼激励及域外借鉴——以ENGO为例

发布时间：2018-05-05 05:21

本文选题：激励 + ENGO　；参考：《生态经济》2017年11期

【摘要】：ENGO作为区别于政府与市场的第三方主体,在我国环境保护和监督中越来越起着重要的引领和示范作用,例如,自我国新《环保法》实施以来,环境公益领域40余起诉讼案件中大部分由ENGO提起。然而,与大量的环境侵害行为和潜在案件量相比,进入环境公益诉讼渠道的显然微乎其微。环境公益诉讼"叫好不叫座"现象的背后则是我国公益诉讼制度设计理念的偏差和缺乏有效的环境公益诉讼激励机制。我国的ENGO环境公益诉讼激励尚属于起步阶段,国外关于ENGO环境公益诉讼的成功经验可给我们以启示:从资金、组织、人员、渠道、监管等方面完善我国ENGO环境公益诉讼激励机制,将激发ENGO环境公益诉讼的积极性和持久性,从而推动我国环境保护公益事业的发展。
[Abstract]:ENGO, as a third party which is different from the government and the market, plays a more and more important role in leading and demonstrating the environmental protection and supervision in our country. For example, since the implementation of the new Environmental Protection Law in China, Most of the more than 40 lawsuits in the field of environmental welfare were filed by ENGO. However, compared with a large number of environmental infringements and potential cases, access to environmental public interest litigation is obviously very little. Behind the phenomenon of environmental public interest litigation is the deviation of the design concept of public interest litigation system and the lack of effective incentive mechanism of environmental public interest litigation. The incentive of ENGO environmental public interest litigation in our country is still in the initial stage. The successful experience of foreign countries on ENGO environmental public interest litigation can give us inspiration: from funds, organizations, personnel, channels, Perfecting the incentive mechanism of ENGO environmental public interest litigation in China will stimulate the enthusiasm and persistence of ENGO environmental public interest litigation and promote the development of our country's environmental protection public welfare cause.
【作者单位】：西北农林科技大学;
【基金】：西北农林科技大学2013基本科研人文社会科学重大项目“农业环境责任法律问题研究”(2013RWZD04)
【分类号】：D922.68;X321

【相似文献】