生活垃圾焚烧烟气脱硝模拟及在运行优化中的应用
本文选题:CFD + 垃圾焚烧炉烟气脱硝 ; 参考:《哈尔滨工业大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:随着城市化进程的发展,我国城市垃圾问题日益严重。垃圾焚烧技术以其 减量化‖及 资源化‖等优势,逐渐成为我国垃圾处理的主流技术。垃圾焚烧不可避免的会产生二次污染气体,其中NOx是垃圾焚烧产生的主要污染物之一。为控制垃圾焚烧NOx的排放,以达到最新国家和地方标准,应对现有垃圾焚烧炉进行脱硝改造。选择性非催化还原(SNCR)脱硝技术改造简单、运行成本相对较低,是目前较流行的生活垃圾焚烧炉烟气脱硝技术之一。本文以一台400 t/d生活垃圾焚烧炉为研究对象,利用计算流体力学(CFD)软件提出垃圾焚烧炉烟气脱硝优化改造方案。首先模拟焚烧炉内的气相燃烧过程和SNCR脱硝反应过程,并通过获取现场实测值、实验验证、文献佐证等方式验证所建立模型的可靠性。其次利用数值模拟方法,对垃圾焚烧的气相燃烧过程和SNCR还原剂喷射过程进行优化。最终提出并评估各垃圾焚烧炉烟气脱硝综合优化方案。本文在优化气相燃烧过程时,设计了6种二次风喷射方式优化方案,考察各喷射方式对炉内烟气运动及燃烧反应的影响。结果表明:优化二次风喷射方式可使炉内形成螺旋结构,并使二次风停留时间最高提升40.62%。以此为基础,优化二次风喷射速度,使一次风:二次风值为0.72:0.28时,达到优化喷射条件。利用SNCR模型,通过单因素模拟和正交模拟,研究喷枪喷射参数(喷射粒径、喷射速度、喷射角、喷射量、喷射浓度)对SNCR系统还原剂蒸发和混合的影响。根据研究结果,设计的最佳喷射参数为:喷射粒径为400μm,喷射速度为35 m/s,喷射角为30°,喷射量50 kg/h,喷射浓度为25%。应用最佳喷射参数,研究喷枪个数和喷枪位置对还原剂分布的影响。设计的喷射最佳排布方式为:8喷枪喷射,采用4墙对喷方式,每墙各2喷枪,喷枪在各墙壁上由中央向两侧依次排布。结合气相燃烧过程优化和SNCR过程优化,设计并筛选脱硝效果较好的综合优化方案进行工程成本及环境经济效益评估。各综合优化方案中,最佳脱硝效果方案的脱硝率可达55.52%。最低工程成本方案在改造15年时垃圾脱硝成本为5.46元/t。最佳环境经济效益方案在改造15年时吨NO去除成本为5 597元/t。以上方案的NO排放最高为183.8 mg/Nm3,满足《GB18485-2014生活垃圾焚烧污染控制标准》和欧盟2000标准,且漏氨体积分数均小于10-4。
[Abstract]:With the development of urbanization, the problem of urban garbage in China is becoming more and more serious. MSW incineration technology has gradually become the mainstream technology of garbage disposal in our country because of its advantages of reducing quantity and resources. MSW incineration will inevitably produce secondary pollution gas, among which NOx is one of the main pollutants produced by MSW incineration. In order to control NOx emission from MSW incineration to meet the latest national and local standards, the existing MSW incinerator should be denitrified. Selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) denitrification is one of the most popular flue gas denitrification technologies in domestic waste incinerators because of its simple revamping and relatively low operating cost. In this paper, a 400 t / d MSW incinerator is used as a research object, and a scheme for optimizing flue gas denitrification of MSW incinerator is proposed by using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software. Firstly, the gas combustion process and SNCR denitrification process in the incinerator were simulated, and the reliability of the established model was verified by obtaining the field measured values, experimental verification and documentary evidence. Secondly, the gas combustion process and SNCR reducing agent injection process of MSW incineration were optimized by numerical simulation. Finally, a comprehensive optimization scheme for flue gas denitrification of waste incinerators is proposed and evaluated. In this paper, six optimization schemes of secondary air injection are designed to optimize the gas combustion process, and the effects of different injection modes on the flue gas movement and combustion reaction in the furnace are investigated. The results show that the helical structure can be formed by optimizing the secondary air injection mode and the residence time of the secondary air can be raised by 40.622. On the basis of this, the injection velocity of secondary air is optimized to reach the optimal injection condition when the secondary air value is 0.72: 0.28. The effects of spray parameters (particle size, injection velocity, injection angle, injection volume and injection concentration) on the evaporation and mixing of reducing agent in SNCR system were studied by single factor simulation and orthogonal simulation using SNCR model. According to the results of the study, the optimum injection parameters are as follows: the injection diameter is 400 渭 m, the injection velocity is 35 m / s, the injection angle is 30 掳, the injection amount is 50 kg / h, the injection concentration is 25%. The effects of the number and position of the spray gun on the distribution of reducing agent were studied by using the optimum injection parameters. The optimal arrangement of spray is designed as: 1: 8 spray gun, 4 wall jet on each wall, 2 guns per wall, and the spray gun is arranged from the center to the two sides on each wall in turn. Combined with gas combustion process optimization and SNCR process optimization, a comprehensive optimization scheme with better denitrification effect was designed and selected for engineering cost and environmental economic evaluation. Among the comprehensive optimization schemes, the denitrification rate of the best denitrification scheme can reach 55.52%. The minimum project cost is 5.46 yuan / t when the cost of waste denitrification is 5.46 yuan / t. The cost of no removal is 5 597 yuan / t when the best environmental economic benefit scheme is reformed for 15 years. The highest no emission of the above scheme is 183.8 mg / Nm ~ (3), which meets the < GB18485-2014 MSW incineration pollution control standard] and EU 2000 standard, and the ammonia leakage volume fraction is less than 10-4.
【学位授予单位】:哈尔滨工业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:X701
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 吴浩;王艳宜;吴燕琦;李倬舸;;深圳市生活垃圾分类对垃圾焚烧影响的研究[J];环境卫生工程;2016年01期
2 伍琳瑛;;广东省生活垃圾焚烧处理的现状与发展趋势研究[J];环境卫生工程;2015年03期
3 殷立宝;徐齐胜;胡志锋;马晓茜;陈昱萌;余昭胜;;四角切圆燃煤锅炉掺烧印染污泥燃烧与NO_x排放特性的数值模拟[J];动力工程学报;2015年03期
4 张向宇;乔海勇;周怀春;徐宏杰;;基于燃烧温度场测量的SNCR优化调整试验[J];热力发电;2014年11期
5 许崇涛;曹阳;武桐;罗永浩;;城市生活垃圾焚烧过程中NO_x的生成与控制研究进展[J];工业锅炉;2014年04期
6 李辉;韩奎华;刘洪涛;路春美;;O_2/CO_2气氛下选择性非催化还原脱硝特性的实验与模拟研宄(英文)[J];Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering;2014年08期
7 马剑;;基于ANSYS Fluent系统的炉排炉垃圾焚烧过程数值模拟[J];能源环境保护;2014年02期
8 李龙君;马晓茜;余昭胜;胡志锋;李茂东;马括;倪进飞;;配风对垃圾焚烧炉温度场影响的模拟研究[J];环境科学与技术;2013年10期
9 蔡洁聪;陈镇超;;600t/d垃圾焚烧炉选择性非催化还原脱硝技术研究[J];热力发电;2013年02期
10 王天泽;楚英豪;郭家秀;尹华强;;烟气脱硝技术应用现状与研究进展[J];四川环境;2012年03期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 卢志民;SNCR反应机理及混合特性研究[D];浙江大学;2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 沈锐林;SNCR脱硝对垃圾焚烧发电锅炉效率的影响[D];华南理工大学;2015年
2 李坚;炉排式垃圾焚烧炉燃烧与SNCR系统优化设计的模拟研究[D];华东理工大学;2015年
3 方熙娟;SNCR-SCR脱硝技术在500t/d垃圾焚烧炉的应用研究[D];清华大学;2015年
4 郭娟;垃圾焚烧发电厂烟气系统优化研究[D];清华大学;2014年
5 殷科;改进型SNCR喷射技术基础研究[D];浙江大学;2014年
6 刘沛奇;450t/h锅炉空气分级与SNCR技术联合脱硝的模拟研究[D];哈尔滨工业大学;2013年
7 李艳丽;垃圾焚烧烟气脱硝的CFD数值模拟研究[D];哈尔滨工业大学;2013年
8 林海;基于CFD的城市生活垃圾焚烧炉优化运行及烟气排放特性实验研究[D];华南理工大学;2012年
9 王海涛;SNCR还原剂液滴与炉内烟气混合的计算模拟及实验研究[D];浙江大学;2011年
10 明臣魁;煤粉燃烧及SNCR脱硝反应过程的数值模拟[D];杭州电子科技大学;2011年
,本文编号:2068070
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shengtaihuanjingbaohulunwen/2068070.html