水生态的物种敏感性风险评价方法改进及应用
[Abstract]:Water body is affected by human activities, especially chemicals, the phenomenon of water algae bloom, species reduction, ecological function damage and so on, there is water ecological risk. It is urgent to solve the problem of how to predict the ecological risk in the field with limited laboratory data. This study aims at improving the assessment method of the impact of the water ecological species on the risk of risk. In the species sensitivity distribution method (Spe Cies sensitivity distributions, SSDs), on the basis of interspecific correlation analysis (Interspecies correlation estimation models, ICE) and acute and chronic ratio method (Acute to chronic), selection of algae toxin and antibiotics as typical pollutants, screening literature and the toxicological experimental data in the global database to improve the combined use of aquatic products. The model of state risk assessment is used to evaluate the ecological risk of algae toxins and antibiotics in some water bodies in China. To clarify the risk degree of species diversity under water ecosystem, and to provide decision support for water environmental quality management. The main results are as follows: (1) improving the ICE-SSD combined model of water ecological risk assessment of four kinds of alga toxin. Two kinds of algae toxin and neurotoxin, the toxoid of cystosporin and cyclosporin in the liver toxin, the toxin and the beta toxin in the neurotoxin as 4 kinds of alga toxin, refer to the 1629 relevant literature of 1864-2016 years in Web of Science, the toxic database of ECOTOX, collect the toxic data, and extrapolate the unknown species through the ICE model. A total of 71 groups of acute toxicity data (LC50/EC50) of 64 aquatic species were obtained to improve the ICE-SSD equation of aquatic organisms; to protect the 95% species as the target, the water ecological risk threshold (Hazardous concentration for 5%of species, HC5) and the potential impact ratio (Potentially affected FR) under different concentrations (Potentially affected FR) were calculated. Action, PAF). The results showed that the sensitivity of hepatotoxin and neurotoxin to aquatic species was not significantly different, the toxoid of cystosporin, cyanobacteria toxin and neurotoxin in hepatotoxin, and the HC5 value of beta toxin to all species were 74.96 mu g, L-1205.39, L-1194.39, L-1194.39, L-1194.39, L-1,0.3, and L-1,0.3 mu g. The ecological risk of water caused by exposure concentration is the largest, and the PAF value of the beta toxin at the detected concentration range of 1-100 G. L-1 is 7.8-43.2%, which is in accordance with the results of the highest toxicity of the beta toxin which hinders the role of the cell ion channel. (2) the water ecological wind risk assessment of six antibiotics is improved by the ACR-SSD combined model. Three classes of antibiotics, such as sulfamethoxazole and sulfadiazine in sulfonamides, tetracycline and oxytetracycline in tetracycline, erythromycin and roxithromycin in large rings of 6 kinds of antibiotics, refer to the ECOTOX and WikiPharma toxicity database, Web of Science and 1864-2016 years of Chinese knowledge net. 7045 related literatures were collected to collect the toxic data and the ACR method was used to calculate the chronic toxic data of unknown species. 144 groups of chronic toxicity data (LOEC/NOEC) of 79 aquatic species were obtained, and the ACR-SSD equation of aquatic organisms was improved. The HC5 threshold of all species and the PAF value under simulated concentration exposure were analyzed, and the analysis was further analyzed. The high toxicity of tetracycline and erythromycin to aquatic primary producers showed that the sensitivity of sulfonamides, tetracycline and macrocyclic lipid antibiotics to aquatic species was not significantly different, among which the ecological risk of erythromycin water in the macrocyclic lipids was the highest and the tetracycline in the tetracycline was higher in ecological risk. The HC5 values of sulfamethoxazole, sulfadiazine, tetracycline, oxytetracycline, erythromycin and roxithromycin were 34.98 mu g. L-1555.64, G, L-1,10.95, L-1,60.87, L-1,2.08, L-1,2.08, G. L-1,19.44 micronux, respectively; the water primary producers were sensitive to erythromycin, and erythromycin was at the beginning of water environment concentration. The PAF value of the class producer was 19.16%, and the results agreed with the related research that the primary producers were more susceptible to the aquatic species conclusion affected by antibiotics. (3) the effects of two kinds of alga toxin and four kinds of antibiotics on species in some Chinese reservoirs and rivers were evaluated, and the results showed non significant ecological risk. Refer to the Web of Science and China knowledge. In the past 1864-2016 years, 5831 relevant documents were collected to obtain the monitoring data of the pollution concentration of the toxoid of Guangdong water Lian Shui Shan reservoir and the the Yanghe River reservoir in Hebei Province, and to screen the sulfamethoxazole, sulfadiazine, tetracycline, oxytetracycline, 4 kinds of antibiotics and sulfamethoxazole in the Pearl River (Delta region), and sulfonamoxazole in the Yangtze River (Delta region) and sulfonamoxazole in the Pearl River (Delta region). The contamination concentration monitoring data of 4 kinds of amines two methazine, erythromycin and roxithromycin were monitored. The ICE-SSD and ACR-SSD combined models were used to calculate the PAF value of the alga toxin and antibiotics respectively. The results showed that the water ecological risk of the cyclosporine toxin and the toxoid of the Yanghe River reservoir in Hebei province was not significant, and the cyanobacteria and toxoid were not significant. The PAF of all species was 0.1% and 0.01%, respectively, which were lower than 5% of the aquatic ecological species protection threshold recommended by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), the water ecological risk of 4 antibiotics in the Yangtze River waters was not significant, and the water ecological risk of 4 antibiotics in the Pearl River waters was not significant, and the PAF of all kinds of antibiotics in the Yangtze River waters was not more than 0.17% of all species in the Pearl River waters. The PAF of all kinds of antibiotics was less than 0.59% in all species and less than 5%. The comparative study of the water ecological risk of antibiotics in the Yangtze and Pearl River waters was similar to that of the Thailand fishery waters, and all the antibiotics did not show significant risk to the water ecosystem.
【学位授予单位】:浙江大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:X826
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 冯承莲;付卫强;Dyer Scott;樊明;吴丰昌;;种间关系预测(ICE)模型在水质基准研究中的应用[J];生态毒理学报;2015年01期
2 章强;辛琦;朱静敏;程金平;;中国主要水域抗生素污染现状及其生态环境效应研究进展[J];环境化学;2014年07期
3 汤嘉骏;刘昕宇;詹志薇;解启来;李斌;徐晨;贾妍燕;;流溪河水体有机氯农药的生态风险评价[J];环境科学学报;2014年10期
4 陈瑾;刘奕梅;张建英;;基于物种敏感性分布的微囊藻毒素与氮污染水体生态风险评估[J];应用生态学报;2014年04期
5 ;Behavior toxicity to Caenorhabditis elegans transferred to the progeny after exposure to sulfamethoxazole at environmentally relevant concentrations[J];Journal of Environmental Sciences;2011年02期
6 闫振广;孟伟;刘征涛;余若祯;张亚辉;;我国淡水水生生物镉基准研究[J];环境科学学报;2009年11期
7 雷炳莉;黄圣彪;王子健;;生态风险评价理论和方法[J];化学进展;2009年Z1期
8 王慧珠;罗义;徐文青;周启星;汤保华;王媛媛;;四环素和金霉素对水生生物的生态毒性效应[J];农业环境科学学报;2008年04期
9 王金辉;秦玉涛;刘材材;孙亚伟;程祥圣;徐韧;;长江口赤潮多发区潜在有毒藻类和赤潮毒素的初步调查[J];海洋环境科学;2006年S1期
10 江天久,陈菊芳,邹迎麟,刘洁生,杨维东;中国东海和南海有害赤潮高发区麻痹性贝毒素研究[J];应用生态学报;2003年07期
,本文编号:2143158
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shengtaihuanjingbaohulunwen/2143158.html