陕西秦岭地区生态安全测度研究
[Abstract]:The Qinling Mountains is a conceptual dividing line between north and south of China. It has a variety of biological resources and abundant water resources. It is an important ecological functional area in Shaanxi and even the whole country. However, in recent years, with the rapid development of society and economy in Qinling, Shaanxi, the demand for natural resources is increasing, and the ecological environment of Qinling has been seriously damaged by, haze, debris flow. Environmental problems such as soil erosion are also a serious threat to people's health and development. Therefore, it is very important to improve the ecological security of Qinling region. Under the condition of research background and significance, this paper combs the relevant theories of ecological security research and literature review at home and abroad, and analyzes the general situation, ecological status and ecological security status of Qinling region of Shaanxi Province. Secondly, the common ecological security measurement methods are analyzed and compared, and the ecological L-V symbiotic model is established and constructed by using the theory of symbiosis, and the index system of ecological security is improved and tested by cluster analysis and variation coefficient method. The index weight is determined by the method of AHP and entropy weight combining qualitative and quantitative analysis. Thirdly, the stable equilibrium point of ecological L-V symbiotic model is solved, and the stability of the model is analyzed dynamically, and the criterion of ecological security is obtained. Based on the above model, the ecological status of 38 districts and counties in Qinling region of Shaanxi Province was measured, and the results of ecological security measurement were obtained. Finally, the paper analyzes the causes of the unfavorable ecological security in the districts and counties, and puts forward some suggestions for improving the characteristics of the Qinling region of Shaanxi Province. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) combining L-V model, analytic hierarchy process, entropy weight method, cluster analysis method and coefficient of variation method, the whole measurement process mentioned above is quantified and subjective randomness is reduced to the maximum extent. The results obtained are more scientific and reasonable. (2) at present, the ecological security situation in Qinling area of Shaanxi Province is the worst in Hanzhong City, followed by Shangluo City, Baoji City and Weinan City. From the longitudinal analysis, we can see that the ecological security situation of 9 districts and counties such as Baqiao District has been improved correspondingly, while the ecological security situation of 10 districts and counties such as Hanyin County is in a downward trend, especially Xunyang County, which has the biggest decline. Improvement measures should be taken as soon as possible. (3) the rapid growth of population, poor development of secondary industry, tourism, forest and pharmaceutical industry and illegal mining of minerals are the main reasons for the deterioration of ecological security in Qinling region of Shaanxi Province. In view of this, this paper puts forward some suggestions on controlling the population quantity and improving the population quality, optimizing the industrial structure and improving the production efficiency, strengthening the supervision and management of the exploitation of mineral resources, utilizing and accelerating the construction of Qinling Park.
【学位授予单位】:西安理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:X826
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王磊;郭灿;李慧明;;基于PSR-TOPSIS模型的宁夏回族自治区土地生态安全评价[J];水土保持研究;2016年06期
2 邵佳;冷志明;;武陵山片区区域生态安全测度与评价[J];经济地理;2016年10期
3 冯彦;祝凌云;郑洁;辛姝玉;张大红;;基于PSR模型和GIS的吉林省县域森林生态安全评价及时空分布[J];农林经济管理学报;2016年05期
4 边得会;曹勇宏;何春光;高昆;;生态健康、生态风险、生态安全概念辨析[J];环境保护科学;2016年05期
5 张凤太;苏维词;;基于均方差-TOPSIS模型的贵州水生态安全评价研究[J];灌溉排水学报;2016年09期
6 汤鹏;王浩;;基于“P-S-R”模型的紫金山国家森林公园生态安全评价[J];江苏农业科学;2016年08期
7 肖成明;王真;郭怀成;;蒙特卡洛模拟在湖泊生态安全评价指标权重确定中的应用[J];安全与环境工程;2016年04期
8 吴柏海;余琦殷;林浩然;;生态安全的基本概念和理论体系[J];林业经济;2016年07期
9 高凤杰;侯大伟;马泉来;黄善林;孙华;;退耕还林背景下寒地山区土地生态安全演变研究[J];干旱区地理;2016年04期
10 陈勇;洪强;刘艳中;曾向阳;甘勇;;地下铁矿山土地生态安全评价——理论方法与实证检验[J];安全与环境学报;2016年03期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 马明德;宁夏东部风沙区生态安全评价研究[D];宁夏大学;2014年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 朱震;甘肃省生态安全影响因素贡献度的实证分析[D];兰州大学;2016年
2 王琪;美丽中国建设中的生态安全问题研究[D];辽宁工业大学;2016年
3 郎珍军;贵阳市岩溶山区生态安全评价研究[D];贵州师范大学;2009年
,本文编号:2190761
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shengtaihuanjingbaohulunwen/2190761.html