跨域环境治理:一个“纵向—横向”机制的分析框架--以“河长制”为分析样本
发布时间：2018-09-03 13:49
【摘要】：从权力运行向度来看,跨域环境治理场域中存在纵向和横向两种权力作用机制。根据纵向、横向权力作用机制的强弱构建出一个跨域环境治理的二维分析框架,划分出"弱治理""权威依赖治理""资源依赖治理""强治理"四种治理模式。应用此框架分析中国跨域流域治理中的制度创新--"河长制",通过纵向机制的强化推动中国跨域河流治理从"弱治理"模式转向"权威依赖治理"模式,在取得短期积极效应的同时也隐藏着危机。规制需求、"纵—横"权力作用机制的互补性,决定了中国跨域流域治理应该导向强纵向机制、强横向机制的"强治理"模式。
[Abstract]:From the aspect of power operation, there are two mechanisms of power action in the field of cross-domain environmental governance. According to the vertical, horizontal power mechanism, a two-dimensional analysis framework of cross-domain environmental governance is constructed, and four governance modes, "weak governance", "authority dependent governance", "resource dependent governance" and "strong governance", are established. This framework is used to analyze the institutional innovation of China's cross-basin management, "River length system", and to promote the transition from "weak governance" mode to "authoritative dependent governance" model of cross-domain river management in China through the strengthening of vertical mechanism. The short-term positive effect also hides the crisis. Regulation demand and the complementarity of "longitudinal and horizontal" power mechanism determine that China's cross-basin governance should be oriented to a strong vertical mechanism and a strong horizontal mechanism of "strong governance" mode.
【作者单位】： 南京大学政府管理学院;
【基金】：江苏省社会科学基金项目(14SZB014)
【分类号】：X321;X52
本文编号：2220148
[Abstract]:From the aspect of power operation, there are two mechanisms of power action in the field of cross-domain environmental governance. According to the vertical, horizontal power mechanism, a two-dimensional analysis framework of cross-domain environmental governance is constructed, and four governance modes, "weak governance", "authority dependent governance", "resource dependent governance" and "strong governance", are established. This framework is used to analyze the institutional innovation of China's cross-basin management, "River length system", and to promote the transition from "weak governance" mode to "authoritative dependent governance" model of cross-domain river management in China through the strengthening of vertical mechanism. The short-term positive effect also hides the crisis. Regulation demand and the complementarity of "longitudinal and horizontal" power mechanism determine that China's cross-basin governance should be oriented to a strong vertical mechanism and a strong horizontal mechanism of "strong governance" mode.
【作者单位】： 南京大学政府管理学院;
【基金】：江苏省社会科学基金项目(14SZB014)
【分类号】：X321;X52
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 刘涛;韩轩;蒋辉;;跨域治理理论比较与启示[J];资源开发与市场;2011年09期
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 方芳;跨域水污染治理中的地方政府协作研究[D];南京农业大学;2014年
2 周倩倩;雾霾跨域治理的行为博弈与多元协同机制研究[D];南京信息工程大学;2016年
3 卢静;我国地方政府空气污染跨域合作治理研究[D];南京大学;2015年
4 王瑶瑶;长三角地区跨域环境治理问题研究[D];华东政法大学;2014年
，本文编号：2220148
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shengtaihuanjingbaohulunwen/2220148.html
