英语反致使结构和中动结构的生成构建比较研究
发布时间：2021-09-28 04:13
英语反致使结构和中动结构在句法和语义上都有相似之处,一直以来很容易被混淆。然而,两种结构在句法和语义方面也存在不少差异。以往文献极少有针对两种结构的系统的对比研究。因此,本研究在生成构建思想基础上,从句法-语义界面的视角,对比两种句式在相同的状态变化事件语境中在事件结构vP和时体结构TP方面的异同。根据句法-语义界面研究领域的组合原则,句法与语义之间具有同构性。因此,句法方面,本研究采用激进生成构建思想（特别是Borer的外骨架思想）的零特征词根假设为全文的核心句法假设,同时运用基本的句法操作如合并与移动来分析每个句式的生成。语义方面,本研究结合新戴维森事件语义学和时间指示语义学的研究成果解释每种句法结构的事件结构和时间结构。具体来讲,本文结合致使论和语义体论,对比两种句式在vP事件建构层面上语义特征的异同,同时探讨每个句法的生成层面、及物性转换以及论元的语义限制等问题。为了对比两种句式在时间域TP层面的异同,本文借鉴时体指示理论来解释每种句式相应的句法结构,同时回答为什么反致使句可以表征真实具体事件而中动句则不能。总之,本文旨在结合针对事件、时和体的句法和语义分析方法来解释两种句式在...
【文章来源】：山东大学山东省 211工程院校 985工程院校 教育部直属院校
【文章页数】：210 页
【学位级别】：博士
【文章目录】：
Abstract
摘要
List of Abbreviations and Notations
Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Clarification of Notions
1.1.1 The Notion of the Middle Construction
1.1.2 The Notion of the Anticausative construction
1.1.3 The Change of State Context
1.2 A Brief Literature Review
1.3 Objective of This Dissertation
1.4 Organization of This Dissertation
Chapter Two Theoretical Background
2.1 Syntactic Foundation for the Generative-constructivism
2.1.1 Split Hypotheses and Grammatical Domains
2.1.2 Case, Merge and Movement
2.2 The Generative -constructivist Framework
2.2.1 vP
2.2.1.1 Light verb
2.2.1.2 Zero-dressed Root View
2.2.1.3 Aspectual Approach and Causal Approach
2.2.1.4 Semantic Aspect and Grammatical Aspect
2.2.1.5 vP, AspP and TP
2.2.2 Split TP
2.2.2.1 Tense and Aspect
2.2.2.2 Difference of Voice from Tense and Aspect
2.3 The Formal Model for the Generative-Constructivist Approach
2.3.1 Event Variable and Time Variable
2.3.2 Tense, tense and Time
2.4 Critical Review of the Generative -constructivist Model
Chapter Three Comparison of Distributions ofVerbal Roots in Anticausative and Middle constructions
3.1 Previous Studies
3.1.1 The Mainstream Generative Approach
3.1.1.1 The Lexical-driven Approach
3.1.1.2 The Syntactic-driven approach
3.1.2 The Generative-constructivist Approach
3.2 The Synthetic generative-constructivist View of ThisDissertation
3.2.1 Derivations at Syntactic Level
3.2.2 Distribution of Root in Syntax
3.2.3 Severing External and Internal Arguments from the Root
3.3 Interim Summary
Chapter Four Comparison of vP betweenAnticausative and Middle constructions
4.1 Inner Features of vP
4.1.1 Event Flavors of Light verbs
4.1.1.1 Aspectual Approach vs. Causal Approach
4.1.1.2 Eventuality
4.2 VBECOME'P in Both Constructions
4.2.1 Merge of VBECOME and the Verbal Root
4.2.2 Introducing Internal Argument
4.3 VCAUSE and Voice
4.3.1 VCAUSE
4.3.2 Introducing External Argument:VCAUSE vs.Voice
4.3.3 Thematic Role of External Argument
4.4 Binary Feature of Causer and Event Identification
4.4.1 Causer vs. Agent
4.4.2 VCAUSE, Voice and Event Identification
4.4.3 Binary Feature of Causer in Causative Construction
4.4.4 Implicit Semantic Roles
4.4.4.1 Implicit Causer in the Anticausative Construction
4.4.4.2 Implicit Agent in the Middle Construction
4.5 Transitivity Alternation
4.5.1 Anticausative Verb
4.5.2 A Common-base Approach to Anticausative Verb
4.5.3 Implicit Causer in the Anticausative Construction
4.5.4 Transitivity Alternation of Middle verb
4.5.5 A Common-base Approach to Middle verb
4.5.6 Implicit Agent in the Middle Construction
4.5.7 Obligatory Modifier in the Middle Construction
4.6 Quantification and Affectedness of Theme Subject
4.6.1 Quantification and Telicity of Event in the AnticausativeConsturction
4.6.2 Quantification and Generic use in the Middle Construction
4.6.3 Affectedness and the Anticausative
4.6.4 Affectedness and the Middle
4.6.4.1 Non-necessity of Affectedness for the Middle Construction
4.6.4.2 Agent Not Equal to Doer
4.7 Interim Summary
Chapter Five Comparison of Split TP between the Anticausative and theMiddle
5.1 Semantics and Syntax of Tense
5.1.1 Time as Entity Hypothesis
5.1.2 Semantic Accounts for Tense
5.1.3 Syntactic Accounts for Tense
5.1.4 Parallelism between Tense and Aspect
5.1.5 Ramchand's Model of Tense
5.1.6 Enlightenment
5.2 Split TP in Anticausative Construction
5.2.1 Simple Past Tense and Default Perfect Aspect
5.2.2 Basic Structure of Split TP
5.2.2.1 Syntactic Representation
5.2.2.2 A-Movement and Head Movement
5.2.3 Temporal Representation
5.2.3.1 Time Variables
5.2.3.2 The Semantic Function of Tense
5.2.3.3 The Semantic Function of Grammatical Aspect
5.2.4 Semantic Translation
5.2.5 Perfectivity and Telicity of Event
5.2.6 Overt Aspectual Form
5.3 Split TP in Middle Construction
5.3.1 Present Tense
5.3.2 Syntactic Representation of Middle Construction
5.3.2.1 Bare Grammatical Aspect
5.3.2.2 Topicalization
5.3.2.3 Case Checking
5.3.2.4 T to C Movement
5.3.3 Temporal Semantic Interpretation
5.4 Interim Summary
Chapter Six Conclusion
6.1 Findings and Theoretic Implications
6.1.1 Findings
6.1.2 Theoretic Implications
6.2 Limitations and Suggestions
References
Acknowledgements
学位论文评阅及答辩情况表
【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]基于事件轻动词理论的致使性交替现象研究[J]. 杨大然. 解放军外国语学院学报. 2015(03)
[2]构式语法研究的历时取向——历时构式语法论纲[J]. 文旭,杨坤. 中国外语. 2015(01)
[3]从动词类型学到体算子情态论——英美语言学传统中的体态理论演进管窥[J]. 尚新. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报). 2014(03)
[4]区分两类领主属宾句的实证理据和理论意义[J]. 马志刚,肖奇民. 天津外国语大学学报. 2014(01)
[5]事件结构与英语语态[J]. 谢国平. 浙江外国语学院学报. 2014(01)
[6]句法研究的意向性解释[J]. 何爱晶. 中国外语. 2013(05)
[7]英语中动语态的构式意义研究[J]. 司联合. 外语与外语教学. 2013(04)
[8]新构式语法的外框架模式与汉语短语研究[J]. 袁野. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报). 2013(03)
[9]英语中动结构的句法-语义界面研究[J]. 高秀雪. 外语教学与研究. 2013(01)
[10]认知和生成学派视角下的构式理论对比研究——以构式语法和第一语段句法为例[J]. 胡旭辉. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报). 2012(03)
博士论文
[1]受事宾语提升的最简主义研究[D]. 南潮.中南大学 2012
本文编号：3411220
【文章来源】：山东大学山东省 211工程院校 985工程院校 教育部直属院校
【文章页数】：210 页
【学位级别】：博士
【文章目录】：
Abstract
摘要
List of Abbreviations and Notations
Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Clarification of Notions
1.1.1 The Notion of the Middle Construction
1.1.2 The Notion of the Anticausative construction
1.1.3 The Change of State Context
1.2 A Brief Literature Review
1.3 Objective of This Dissertation
1.4 Organization of This Dissertation
Chapter Two Theoretical Background
2.1 Syntactic Foundation for the Generative-constructivism
2.1.1 Split Hypotheses and Grammatical Domains
2.1.2 Case, Merge and Movement
2.2 The Generative -constructivist Framework
2.2.1 vP
2.2.1.1 Light verb
2.2.1.2 Zero-dressed Root View
2.2.1.3 Aspectual Approach and Causal Approach
2.2.1.4 Semantic Aspect and Grammatical Aspect
2.2.1.5 vP, AspP and TP
2.2.2 Split TP
2.2.2.1 Tense and Aspect
2.2.2.2 Difference of Voice from Tense and Aspect
2.3 The Formal Model for the Generative-Constructivist Approach
2.3.1 Event Variable and Time Variable
2.3.2 Tense, tense and Time
2.4 Critical Review of the Generative -constructivist Model
Chapter Three Comparison of Distributions ofVerbal Roots in Anticausative and Middle constructions
3.1 Previous Studies
3.1.1 The Mainstream Generative Approach
3.1.1.1 The Lexical-driven Approach
3.1.1.2 The Syntactic-driven approach
3.1.2 The Generative-constructivist Approach
3.2 The Synthetic generative-constructivist View of ThisDissertation
3.2.1 Derivations at Syntactic Level
3.2.2 Distribution of Root in Syntax
3.2.3 Severing External and Internal Arguments from the Root
3.3 Interim Summary
Chapter Four Comparison of vP betweenAnticausative and Middle constructions
4.1 Inner Features of vP
4.1.1 Event Flavors of Light verbs
4.1.1.1 Aspectual Approach vs. Causal Approach
4.1.1.2 Eventuality
4.2 VBECOME'P in Both Constructions
4.2.1 Merge of VBECOME and the Verbal Root
4.2.2 Introducing Internal Argument
4.3 VCAUSE and Voice
4.3.1 VCAUSE
4.3.2 Introducing External Argument:VCAUSE vs.Voice
4.3.3 Thematic Role of External Argument
4.4 Binary Feature of Causer and Event Identification
4.4.1 Causer vs. Agent
4.4.2 VCAUSE, Voice and Event Identification
4.4.3 Binary Feature of Causer in Causative Construction
4.4.4 Implicit Semantic Roles
4.4.4.1 Implicit Causer in the Anticausative Construction
4.4.4.2 Implicit Agent in the Middle Construction
4.5 Transitivity Alternation
4.5.1 Anticausative Verb
4.5.2 A Common-base Approach to Anticausative Verb
4.5.3 Implicit Causer in the Anticausative Construction
4.5.4 Transitivity Alternation of Middle verb
4.5.5 A Common-base Approach to Middle verb
4.5.6 Implicit Agent in the Middle Construction
4.5.7 Obligatory Modifier in the Middle Construction
4.6 Quantification and Affectedness of Theme Subject
4.6.1 Quantification and Telicity of Event in the AnticausativeConsturction
4.6.2 Quantification and Generic use in the Middle Construction
4.6.3 Affectedness and the Anticausative
4.6.4 Affectedness and the Middle
4.6.4.1 Non-necessity of Affectedness for the Middle Construction
4.6.4.2 Agent Not Equal to Doer
4.7 Interim Summary
Chapter Five Comparison of Split TP between the Anticausative and theMiddle
5.1 Semantics and Syntax of Tense
5.1.1 Time as Entity Hypothesis
5.1.2 Semantic Accounts for Tense
5.1.3 Syntactic Accounts for Tense
5.1.4 Parallelism between Tense and Aspect
5.1.5 Ramchand's Model of Tense
5.1.6 Enlightenment
5.2 Split TP in Anticausative Construction
5.2.1 Simple Past Tense and Default Perfect Aspect
5.2.2 Basic Structure of Split TP
5.2.2.1 Syntactic Representation
5.2.2.2 A-Movement and Head Movement
5.2.3 Temporal Representation
5.2.3.1 Time Variables
5.2.3.2 The Semantic Function of Tense
5.2.3.3 The Semantic Function of Grammatical Aspect
5.2.4 Semantic Translation
5.2.5 Perfectivity and Telicity of Event
5.2.6 Overt Aspectual Form
5.3 Split TP in Middle Construction
5.3.1 Present Tense
5.3.2 Syntactic Representation of Middle Construction
5.3.2.1 Bare Grammatical Aspect
5.3.2.2 Topicalization
5.3.2.3 Case Checking
5.3.2.4 T to C Movement
5.3.3 Temporal Semantic Interpretation
5.4 Interim Summary
Chapter Six Conclusion
6.1 Findings and Theoretic Implications
6.1.1 Findings
6.1.2 Theoretic Implications
6.2 Limitations and Suggestions
References
Acknowledgements
学位论文评阅及答辩情况表
【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]基于事件轻动词理论的致使性交替现象研究[J]. 杨大然. 解放军外国语学院学报. 2015(03)
[2]构式语法研究的历时取向——历时构式语法论纲[J]. 文旭,杨坤. 中国外语. 2015(01)
[3]从动词类型学到体算子情态论——英美语言学传统中的体态理论演进管窥[J]. 尚新. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报). 2014(03)
[4]区分两类领主属宾句的实证理据和理论意义[J]. 马志刚,肖奇民. 天津外国语大学学报. 2014(01)
[5]事件结构与英语语态[J]. 谢国平. 浙江外国语学院学报. 2014(01)
[6]句法研究的意向性解释[J]. 何爱晶. 中国外语. 2013(05)
[7]英语中动语态的构式意义研究[J]. 司联合. 外语与外语教学. 2013(04)
[8]新构式语法的外框架模式与汉语短语研究[J]. 袁野. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报). 2013(03)
[9]英语中动结构的句法-语义界面研究[J]. 高秀雪. 外语教学与研究. 2013(01)
[10]认知和生成学派视角下的构式理论对比研究——以构式语法和第一语段句法为例[J]. 胡旭辉. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报). 2012(03)
博士论文
[1]受事宾语提升的最简主义研究[D]. 南潮.中南大学 2012
本文编号：3411220
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/rwkxbs/3411220.html
