权力选择与身份认同：档案与社会记忆建构的两个维度

发布时间：2018-07-01 11:54

本文选题：社会记忆 + 档案工作　；参考：《山东大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：记忆是个体和群体过往经历和经验的见证和再现,是个体和群体确立自身意识和身份认同的基础。档案是社会生产生活过程中产生的、具有原始记录性的文字记录,是建构社会记忆的重要资源,同时档案工作通过一系列的管理和开发利用措施,对社会记忆建构产生非常重要的影响。本文深入研究权力选择和身份认同在档案建构社会记忆过程中所扮演的角色,探究削减权力消极干预、确立身份认同的途径,建构全面、真实、均衡的社会记忆。绪论部分对以往的档案与记忆研究成果进行了系统梳理和内容分析,总结现有研究成就和不足,为本文研究提供了借鉴和思路。正文部分首先从基础入手,基于档案的起源与发展,对档案与社会记忆之间的关系进行了深入探究。档案是社会记忆的记录载体,社会记忆通过档案及档案工作得以建构。但档案及档案工作建构社会记忆也存在局限性。首先,档案并不能涵盖所有的记忆资源;其次,档案及档案工作在各方面受权力选择的干预;第三,传统的档案工作以组织机构的官方叙述为中心,往往忽略非主流群体建构自身群体记忆及身份认同的需要。由此,档案建构社会记忆过程中非常重要但目前研究中鲜少涉及的两个维度——权力选择与身份认同进入研究视野。本文第三章论述了权力对档案及档案工作进行干预的途径、权力干预对档案建构社会记忆的影响、削弱权力干预消极影响的途径。第四章论述了传统的以组织机构为中心的档案工作建构身份认同的优势、途径及不足,并由此引出非传统档案工作在建构群体身份认同和削减权力消极干预方面的重要作用,将权力干预与身份认同联系在一起。在提出削减权力消极干预和建构身份认同的途径的基础上,本文第五章提出了档案建构社会记忆所要达到的目标,分析了现阶段档案工作在建构社会记忆过程中存在的问题,并探索出建构全面、真实、均衡的社会记忆的途径,由此希望对档案工作建构社会记忆的过程提供一些有效的指导和建议。
[Abstract]:Memory is the witness and representation of past experiences and experiences of individuals and groups, and it is the basis for individuals and groups to establish their own consciousness and identity. Archives, which are produced in the process of social production and life, are original written records and important resources for the construction of social memory. At the same time, archives work through a series of management, development and utilization measures. It has a very important influence on the construction of social memory. This paper deeply studies the role of power selection and identity in the process of archives construction social memory, explores the negative interference of reducing power, establishes the way of identity, and constructs comprehensive, real and balanced social memory. In the introduction part, the author systematically combs and analyzes the previous research results of archives and memory, summarizes the achievements and shortcomings of the existing research, and provides a reference and train of thought for the research of this paper. Based on the origin and development of archives, this paper explores the relationship between archives and social memory. Archives are the record carriers of social memory, which can be constructed through archives and archival work. However, archives and archival work also have limitations in the construction of social memory. First, archives do not cover all memory resources; second, archives and archival work are interfered in various aspects by choice of power; and third, traditional archival work centers on the official narrative of the organization. It often ignores the need for non-mainstream groups to construct their own group memory and identity. As a result, the two dimensions that are very important in the process of archival construction but seldom involved in the present research are the choice of power and identity. The third chapter discusses the ways of power intervention on archives and archival work, the influence of power intervention on archives construction social memory, and the way to weaken the negative influence of power intervention. The fourth chapter discusses the advantages, approaches and shortcomings of the traditional organization-centered archival work in the construction of identity, and leads to the important role of non-traditional archival work in the construction of group identity and the reduction of negative intervention of power. Power intervention is associated with identity. On the basis of the negative intervention of reducing power and the construction of identity, the fifth chapter of this paper puts forward the goal that archives should achieve in constructing social memory, and analyzes the problems existing in the process of constructing social memory in archival work at the present stage. The author also explores the ways to construct comprehensive, real and balanced social memory, hoping to provide some effective guidance and suggestions for the construction of social memory in archival work.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G270

【参考文献】