S市创建全国文明城市测评实践研究
本文选题:文明城市 + 城市文明程度指数 ; 参考:《东北大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:城市作为人民生产生活的空间场所,其文明特征随着经济社会的不断发展及人民素质的不断提高显得愈发明显。上世纪末期,我国总结近代以来城市文明的发展变迁范式,在全国掀起了文明城市的创建活动。当代中国的文明城市建设以“文明”为根本标志,坚持政治文明、物质文明、精神文明、社会文明和生态文明协调发展,以实现城市整体文明水平的有序提高。经过20多年的发展,文明城市无论是在创建方面,还是在城市文明测评方面都取得了一定的成绩,先后有南京、厦门、大连等多个城市被评选为中国文明城市。具体到文明城市测评实践,从2004年《全国文明城市测评体系(试行)》的颁布到2005年出台《全国文明城市测评体系操作手册》,再到现在的2011年版《全国文明城市测评体系》,文明城市测评工作在科学的指导下开展的有声有色。其中,《全国文明城市测评体系》通过综合运用实地考察、材料审核、问卷调查、网络媒体调查四种方法,把城市这一个大社会、大系统作为大型实验的场所和考量对象,对城市进行文明程度指数的测评。此测评方法实现了对城市物质文明、政治文明、精神文明创建的评估和考核,也打开了社会大型实验之门。本文结合S市文明测评的实践活动,运用公共产品理论、公共选择理论、系统理论和国民素质理论对S市的文明城市测评实践活动进行了实证研究。全文共分为四个部分:第一部分从文明城市建设的核心概念和理论基础出发,强调在创建文明城市和开展测评实践应注重系统规划、市民参与,为创建文明城市以及开展文明城市测评实践提供了理论支撑。第二部分对S市开展的文明城市测评实践进行了简要概述,并系统的通过数字化方式呈现了测评实践所取得成果。第三部分针对S市文明城市测评实践本身,通过笔者的亲身参与,指出了S市在创建全国文明城市测评实践中所存在的问题并分析产生问题的原因。第四部分是对S市在创建全国文明城市测评实践所存在的问题提出对策和建议。
[Abstract]:As the space of people's production and life, the civilization characteristic of city becomes more and more obvious with the development of economy and society and the improvement of people's quality. At the end of last century, China summarized the paradigm of urban civilization development and vicissitude since modern times, and set off the establishment of civilized city in the whole country. The construction of civilized cities in contemporary China takes "civilization" as the basic symbol, and adheres to the coordinated development of political civilization, material civilization, spiritual civilization, social civilization and ecological civilization in order to realize the orderly improvement of the overall civilization level of the city. After more than 20 years of development, civilized cities have made some achievements in terms of establishment and evaluation of urban civilization, including Nanjing, Xiamen, Dalian and many other cities, which have been selected as Chinese civilization cities. To the practice of evaluating civilized cities, From the promulgation of the National civilized City Evaluation system (trial) in 2004 to the publication of the operational Manual of the National civilized City Evaluation system in 2005, to the present 2011 edition of the National civilized City Evaluation system, the evaluation of civilized cities has been carried out. Carried out under the guidance of science. Among them, the "National civilized City Evaluation system" takes the city as a large society and a large system as the place and object of large-scale experiments through the comprehensive use of four methods: field investigation, material review, questionnaire survey, and network media investigation. To carry on the city to carry on the civilized degree index appraisal. The evaluation method not only realizes the evaluation and assessment of urban material civilization, political civilization and spiritual civilization, but also opens the door of social large-scale experiment. Based on the practice of the evaluation of civilization in S City, this paper makes an empirical study on the practical activities of the Evaluation of civilized cities in S City by using the theory of public goods, the theory of public choice, the theory of system and the theory of national quality. The thesis is divided into four parts: the first part is based on the core concept and theoretical basis of the construction of civilized city, and emphasizes that the systematic planning and citizen participation should be paid attention to in the establishment of civilized city and the practice of evaluation and evaluation. It provides theoretical support for the establishment of civilized cities and the practice of evaluating civilized cities. The second part gives a brief overview of the practice of the evaluation of civilized cities in S city, and presents the achievements of the evaluation practice systematically through the digital method. In the third part, aiming at the practice of evaluating the civilized cities in S city, the author points out the problems existing in the practice of the evaluation and evaluation of the civilized cities of the whole country and analyzes the causes of the problems through the personal participation of the author. The fourth part is to put forward the countermeasures and suggestions on the problems existing in the practice of the evaluation and evaluation of S city in the establishment of the national civilized city.
【学位授予单位】:东北大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D64
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 朱清;;持续打造全国文明城市亮丽品牌——对厦门市创建文明城市工作的思考[J];福建行政学院学报;2008年05期
2 罗朝良;;创建文明城市与构建和谐社会[J];科学社会主义;2009年04期
3 徐德胜;杨利为;何传春;;南京市创建文明城市的特点和启示[J];探求;2010年01期
4 林菲;;对创建文明城市的几点思考[J];法制与社会;2010年12期
5 董鸿扬;杜丹;;哈尔滨创建全国文明城市存在的问题及对策[J];哈尔滨市委党校学报;2010年03期
6 张秀清;;关于乌海市创建全国文明城市的思考[J];中国城市经济;2010年10期
7 张苗;;如何完善创建文明城市的长效机制[J];才智;2011年16期
8 万时乐;;城市文明与市民个体道德能力的提升[J];学术论坛;2011年11期
9 钟诗蓉;;论创建全国文明城市工作中的材料收集与整理[J];城建档案;2012年02期
10 李腊生;;试论文明城市创建长效机制——以武汉市为例[J];今日中国论坛;2012年12期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 陈东冬;;建设和谐文化,创建全国文明城市的对策研究[A];科学发展与社会责任(B卷)——第五届沈阳科学学术年会文集[C];2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 沈晓冬;我国文明城市创建政策工具研究[D];上海交通大学;2013年
2 周帆;创建文明城市中的政府职能优化研究[D];重庆师范大学;2013年
3 尹颉;文明城市创建中市民自律意识培育研究[D];长江大学;2015年
4 张弘毅;区域协同治理视域中江苏省沿江文明城市带创建研究[D];苏州大学;2015年
5 陈宁;S市创建全国文明城市测评实践研究[D];东北大学;2014年
6 蔡育权;《文明城市测评体系》研究[D];厦门大学;2008年
7 王昕睿;文明城市创建中的政府行为研究[D];内蒙古大学;2011年
8 刘泽锋;文明城市创建中的政府职能优化研究[D];湖南师范大学;2010年
9 高伟;临沂市文明城市创建的长效机制探索[D];山东大学;2011年
10 崔浩;文明城市创建中的公众参与问题研究[D];苏州大学;2009年
,本文编号:1953160
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/sizhenglunwen/1953160.html