中文科技期刊被撤销论文特征分析及启示

发布时间：2018-02-24 10:03

本文关键词： 科技期刊撤销论文撤销时滞被撤销原因　出处：《中国科技期刊研究》2017年11期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：【目的】分析中国知网(CNKI)数据库科技期刊被撤销论文特征,以期为我国科技期刊管理提供参考。【方法】检索CNKI数据库自开始收录至2016年12月31日发表的撤销或撤稿声明,逐条分析被撤销论文的来源期刊、撤销时间、发表时间及被撤销原因,并根据论文撤销时间和发表时间计算论文撤销时滞。【结果】共检索到210篇被撤销论文,分布在146种期刊中,且全部为科技期刊。2007—2016年被撤销论文数量逐年增加,2015年最多。210篇被撤销论文的撤销时滞为1~145个月,平均撤销时滞为15.8个月。因学术不端问题被撤销的论文数量最多,占48.6%。【结论】我国被撤销论文的比例和涉及期刊的比例均较低,科学界自我净化力度仍需加强。对于存在的学术不端等问题,尚需编辑界和学术界进一步加强审核监督。
[Abstract]:[objective] to analyze the characteristics of the cancelled scientific and technological journals in CNKI database, in order to provide a reference for the management of Chinese sci-tech journals. [methods] to search the CNKI database from the beginning to the withdrawal or withdrawal statement issued on December 31st 2016. The source journals, the time of revocation, the time of publication and the reasons for the cancellation were analyzed. According to the time of revocation and the time of publication, the time delay of revocation was calculated. [results] A total of 210 cancelled papers were retrieved. The number of cancelled papers was increased year by year from 2007 to 2016. In 2015, the time lag of revocation of most .210 cancelled papers ranged from 1 to 145 months. The average time lag of revocation is 15.8 months. The number of papers cancelled due to academic misconduct is the highest, accounting for 48.6. [conclusion] the proportion of cancelled papers and the proportion of periodicals involved in China are low. The self-purification of the scientific community still needs to be strengthened, and the editorial and academic circles should further strengthen the audit supervision for the problems of academic misconduct and so on.
【作者单位】：河南省科技期刊研究中心;新乡医学院管理学院;
【分类号】：G237.5;G353.1

【相似文献】