高校机构知识库微观政策研究

发布时间：2018-05-09 08:24

本文选题：机构知识库 + 微观政策　；参考：《辽宁大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：20世纪以来,随着开放存取运动的发展,图书情报界出现一种在网络环境下学者进行学术交流与资源共享的全新模式——机构知识库。从国内外机构知识库建设发展情况看,技术已经不是最主要的问题,相关的政策和规范机制是支持机构知识库持续健康发展的保障。政策的制定与不断完善是构建机构知识库过程中非常重要的一环,它为机构知识库的建设与发展提供了重要依据和宏观指导。本文对英美及国内高校机构知识库微观政策的发展现状进行比较分析,在其基础上提出几点建议。本文包括以下几部分内容:绪论部分阐述机构知识库兴起背景和定义,概括出机构知识库机构性、学术性、动态性和开放性的特征。从知识库类型、大洲分布、国家分布和软件类型了解机构知识库发展现状。强调政策因素对机构知识库加快交流传播、实现开放共享与长久保存的理论与现实意义。第一章阐述机构知识库相关理论及政策,总结学界对机构知识库的几种定义,简要概括机构知识库的功能,对图书馆和个人的影响。简要描述国内外在开放存取宏观政策上的进展,通过OpenDOAR调查全球机构知识库微观政策制定情况,着重分析英美及国内高校机构知识库的微观政策制定情况。第二章具体分析英美及国内高校机构知识库微观政策。内容政策从资源内容与人员范围;提交政策从资源形式与类型、文档格式、元数据标准、提交方式;使用政策从授权许可模式;保存政策从存储许可协议和撤销政策等方面具体比较其在微观政策上的差异。第三章就高校机构知识库构建与服务过程中遇到的问题,以图书馆、用户和资源拥有者三者为主体,形成一个高校机构知识库微观生态系统模型,根据国外大学机构知识库建设经验并结合中国实际,资源建设方面提出强制性为主,自愿与强制性相结合的提交策略,知识产权方面明确软件版权和资源版权的处理方式,传播使用方面提倡充分利用创作共享和合理使用原则,最后通过制定权益管理规范规定机构知识库有关各方的权利义务关系。第四章对本文研究进行总结,我国机构知识库在微观政策制定方面略显迟滞,与国外一样,虽然在政策方面有所发展,但相当数量的高校机构知识库在确定了政策基本框架之后并没有及时进行具体政策的补充,形式大于内容,限制了机构知识库的可持续发展。应当对机构知识库的政策制定给予足够的重视并持续完善。
[Abstract]:Since the 20th century, with the development of the open access movement, a new model of academic exchange and resource sharing among scholars in the network environment has emerged in the field of library and information, which is the institutional knowledge base. From the point of view of the development of institutional knowledge base construction at home and abroad, technology is not the most important problem, and relevant policies and normative mechanisms are the guarantee to support the sustainable and healthy development of institutional knowledge base. Policy formulation and continuous improvement is a very important part in the process of building institutional knowledge base, which provides important basis and macro guidance for the construction and development of institutional knowledge base. This paper makes a comparative analysis of the present situation of the development of institutional knowledge base of institutions in Britain, America and China, and puts forward some suggestions on the basis of it. This paper includes the following parts: the introduction describes the background and definition of institutional knowledge base, and summarizes the institutional, academic, dynamic and open characteristics of institutional knowledge base. To understand the development of institutional knowledge base from knowledge base type, continent distribution, country distribution and software type. It emphasizes the theoretical and practical significance of policy factors to accelerate the communication and dissemination of institutional knowledge base and to realize open sharing and long-term preservation. The first chapter describes the relevant theories and policies of institutional knowledge base, summarizes several definitions of institutional knowledge base in academic circles, and briefly summarizes the functions of institutional knowledge base and its influence on libraries and individuals. This paper briefly describes the development of open access macro policy at home and abroad, and analyzes the micro policy making of institutional knowledge base in British, American and domestic universities by OpenDOAR survey. The second chapter analyzes the micro policy of institutional knowledge base in the United States, America and China. Content policy from resource content and personnel scope; submit policy from resource form and type, document format, metadata standard, submission mode; use policy from licensing mode; The preservation policy compares the differences in microcosmic policy from storage license agreement and revocation policy. In the third chapter, the author takes library, user and resource owner as the main body to form a micro-ecosystem model of institutional knowledge base in colleges and universities. According to the experience of foreign universities' institutional knowledge base construction and the reality of China, this paper puts forward a mandatory, voluntary and compulsory submission strategy for resource construction, and clarifies the way to deal with software copyright and resource copyright in the aspect of intellectual property. In the aspect of communication and use, the principle of creative sharing and reasonable use should be fully utilized, and the rights and obligations of the parties concerned in the institutional knowledge base should be stipulated through the formulation of rights and interests management norms. The fourth chapter summarizes the research of this paper. The institutional knowledge base in our country is slightly lagging behind in the micro policy making, as in foreign countries, although the institutional knowledge base has developed in the policy aspect, However, a considerable number of institutional knowledge bases in colleges and universities have not been supplemented by specific policies in time after the basic framework of policies has been determined, and the form is greater than the content, which limits the sustainable development of institutional knowledge bases. The policy-making of institutional knowledge base should be paid enough attention and continuously improved.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G250.74

【参考文献】