我国63个学科期刊平均自引率与学科期刊数量、被引集中度相关性分析

发布时间：2018-05-25 15:29

本文选题：学科期刊平均自引率 + 学科平均集中度　；参考：《科技与出版》2017年11期

【摘要】：在前期研究中,笔者团队发现中国63个学科期刊平均自引率与学科大小偶尔会存在相关性,并且还发现学科期刊平均自引率与学科被引集中度也具有一定的关系。为了进一步研究中国各学科期刊平均自引率与学科大小和学科被引集中度的关系,本研究以2013—2016年版中国知网《中国学术期刊影响力年报(自然科学与工程技术)》(统计年为2012—2014)的4年数据为基础,对我国63个学科约4 000种期刊的自引情况进行分析。结果发现:(1)由于学科的交叉性越来越强,学科期刊平均自引率与学科大小越不具有相关性,同时学科平均被引集中度也与学科大小无关;(2)学科期刊平均自引率与学科平均被引集中度存在显著的负相关,低的学科期刊平均自引率具有较高的扩散性;(3)中国学术期刊的引用中,期刊自身引用起了很大作用,体现了科研成果报道的延续性。
[Abstract]:In the previous study, the author's team found that the average self-citation rate of 63 subject journals in China occasionally correlated with the subject size, and also found that the average self-citation rate of the subject journals had a certain relationship with the degree of subject citation concentration. In order to further study the relationship between the average self-citation rate and the subject size and the citation concentration of each subject in China, The results showed that the average self-citation rate of the subject journals was not correlated with the size of the subject because of the increasingly intersecting nature of the subject. At the same time, there is a significant negative correlation between the average citation rate and the average citation concentration. The low average self-citation rate of academic journals has a high diffusivity) in the citation of Chinese academic journals, the citation of periodicals themselves plays a great role, which reflects the continuity of the reporting of scientific research results.
【作者单位】：南京林业大学期刊编辑部;江苏省南通市海安县城东镇韩徐村;
【基金】：江苏省期刊协会资助项目(2016JSQKA010)
【分类号】：G237.5;G353.1

【相似文献】