中国高影响力学者对学术社交网站的使用行为调查——以教育部长江学者为例

发布时间：2018-06-27 06:26

本文选题：学术社交网络 + ResearchGate　；参考：《情报资料工作》2017年03期

【摘要】：文章调查了2013年、2014年长江学者在Research Gate、Mendeley、Academia和学术圈这四个学术社交网络上的基本数据。调查结果显示,长江学者在各大学术社交网络上的总体注册率均未超过50%,显示出使用情况并不理想,同时长江学者对学术社交网络持续使用仍有待提高,但ResearchGate是个例外。研究结果也表明,相比其他学术社交网络,ResearchGate能为长江学者提供更高的显示度。学科差异在使用较为活跃的学术社交网络中也同样存在,理学、工学和医学比人文社会科学的科研人员活跃度更高。
[Abstract]:The article surveyed basic data on four academic social networks, Research Gate.com MendeleyAcademia and academic circles, in 2013 and 2014. The results show that the overall registration rate of Changjiang scholars on all major academic social networks is less than 50, indicating that the use of academic social networks is not satisfactory, and that the sustained use of academic social networks by Changjiang scholars still needs to be improved, but ResearchGate is an exception. The results also show that ResearchGate can provide a better display for Yangtze River scholars than other academic social networks. Disciplinary differences also exist in the use of more active academic social networks, where researchers in science, engineering and medicine are more active than researchers in humanities and social sciences.
【作者单位】：南昌航空大学经济管理学院;
【基金】：江西省教育厅科技项目“基于学术社交网络的科研人员信息行为研究”(编号:GJJ150713)的研究成果之一
【分类号】：G252

【相似文献】