当代中国公共图书馆政府政策研究

发布时间：2018-06-27 16:06

本文选题：公共图书馆 + 政府政策　；参考：《湘潭大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：我国公共图书馆事业作为政府主导的公共文化事业重要组成部分,一直受到我国各级政府和主管部门相关政策文件的指导。近年来,随着国家文化发展战略的调整和政府职能的转变,尤其在当前《公共图书馆法》尚未出台,政府政策的制定和实施对公共图书馆发展的影响愈来愈明显。在此背景下,深入研究当代中国公共图书馆政府政策,探讨不同阶段下公共图书馆政府政策的时代特征,回溯公共图书馆政府政策的实际效用,对完善图书馆事业政策体系,推动公共图书馆事业发展具有重要的理论和实践价值。文章采用文献分析法、历史研究方法、比较分析法等方法开展。通过对当代中国公共图书馆政府政策进行系统的梳理与分析,将当代中国公共图书馆政府政策的发展历程划分为四个时期,即曲折探索时期(1949年-1977年)、初步发展时期(1978年-1991年)、稳步发展时期(1992年-2004年)以及体系化构建时期(2005年至今)。在此基础上,针对每一时期内政策进行分析研究,探索公共图书馆政府政策在形成背景、发展特质以及实际效用等方面所呈现出的时代特征。本研究首先综述选题背景与意义,对公共图书馆政府政策研究现状进行简要回顾,并对研究思路、方法以及可能创新之处作以说明,同时对当代中国公共图书馆政府政策的概念、主客体、特征和时期划分进行系统的介绍;其次,文章从当代中国公共图书馆政府政策的时代背景、内容体系、发展特质以及实际效用等角度,重点分析四个不同时期内政府政策所呈现的典型特征,以及政府政策给予公共图书馆事业带来的影响;最后,在总结当代中国公共图书馆政府政策演变脉络的同时,宏观把握其对我国公共图书馆事业发展的影响。通过对当代中国公共图书馆政府政策进行系统梳理分析研究,发现政策的制定因受时代性影响具有一定的局限性,因此呼吁在未来政策制定过程中能够更加科学。同时通过结合公共图书馆事业发展现状考察公共图书馆政策发现,相比于对政策制定的关注度而言,对政策的实施和政策的实际效用则关注较少,因此我国政府不仅应增强政策制定的科学性,而且也应该增加对政策的实施和效用的考察与关注。
[Abstract]:As an important part of public culture, the public library in China is always guided by the relevant policy documents of all levels of government and competent departments. In recent years, with the adjustment of national cultural development strategy and the transformation of government functions, especially in the current "Public Library Law" has not been issued, the formulation and implementation of government policies on the development of public libraries is becoming more and more obvious. Under this background, the paper deeply studies the government policy of contemporary Chinese public library, probes into the characteristics of the times of the government policy of public library in different stages, traces the actual utility of the government policy of public library, and improves the policy system of library undertaking. It is of great theoretical and practical value to promote the development of public library. This paper adopts the methods of literature analysis, historical research and comparative analysis. Through the systematic analysis and analysis of the government policy of the contemporary Chinese public library, the development course of the government policy of the contemporary Chinese public library is divided into four periods. That is, the period of tortuous exploration (1949-1977), the period of preliminary development (1978-1991), the period of steady development (1992-2004) and the period of systematization (2005-present). On this basis, this paper analyzes and studies the policies in each period, and explores the characteristics of the times in the forming background, the development characteristics and the actual utility of the government policies in the public libraries. This study first summarizes the background and significance of the topic, briefly reviews the current situation of government policy research in public libraries, and explains the research ideas, methods and possible innovations. At the same time, the concept, subject and object, characteristics and time division of the government policy of contemporary Chinese public library are systematically introduced. Secondly, the paper introduces the background and content system of the government policy of contemporary Chinese public library. From the perspective of development characteristics and actual utility, this paper analyzes the typical characteristics of government policies in four different periods, and the impact of government policies on public library undertakings. This paper summarizes the evolution of government policies in contemporary China's public libraries, and at the same time, holds its influence on the development of public libraries in China macroscopically. Through systematical analysis and research on the government policies of contemporary Chinese public libraries, it is found that the formulation of policies is limited by the times, and therefore calls for a more scientific policy making process in the future. At the same time, combining with the present situation of the development of the public library, we find that, compared with the attention paid to the policy formulation, less attention is paid to the implementation of the policy and the practical utility of the policy. Therefore, our government should not only enhance the scientific nature of policy making, but also pay more attention to the implementation and utility of policy.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G258.2

【参考文献】