《四库集部提要汇辑汇校汇考》“考论”三则
发布时间：2018-10-18 17:19
【摘要】：著录的《离骚图》一书,有萧云从原绘本与乾隆年间补绘本的差异,致使纂修者、纂修时间以及书名、卷数也都有差异,体现了四库全书纂修的阶段性特点。文渊阁《四库全书》本与文津阁《四库全书》本《曹子建集》,据以缮录的不是同一个本子;文津阁本与明活字本相同处甚多,但也并不是简单的照录;今人《四库提要辨证》用明活字本来评说文渊阁本的错误,并不合适。宋晁补之《鸡肋集》提要的模糊说法对后世造成了误解。
[Abstract]:There is the difference between the original picture book of Xiao Yun and the supplementary picture book of Qianlong period, which leads to the difference of the editor, the compilation time, the title of the book and the number of volumes, which embodies the stage characteristic of the compilation of Siku book. The text of Wen Yuan Pavilion and Wen Jin GE < Si Kuquan] is not the same book on the basis of the collection of Cao Zijian, the text of Wenjin Pavilion is much the same as the movable text of Ming Dynasty, but it is not a simple record. It is not appropriate to use Ming movable word to comment on the mistakes of Wen Yuan Pavilion. Song Chao Buzhi "Ji Li Ji" the fuzzy statement of later generations caused misunderstanding.
【作者单位】： 南京师范大学文学院;
【分类号】：G256
，
本文编号：2279837
[Abstract]:There is the difference between the original picture book of Xiao Yun and the supplementary picture book of Qianlong period, which leads to the difference of the editor, the compilation time, the title of the book and the number of volumes, which embodies the stage characteristic of the compilation of Siku book. The text of Wen Yuan Pavilion and Wen Jin GE < Si Kuquan] is not the same book on the basis of the collection of Cao Zijian, the text of Wenjin Pavilion is much the same as the movable text of Ming Dynasty, but it is not a simple record. It is not appropriate to use Ming movable word to comment on the mistakes of Wen Yuan Pavilion. Song Chao Buzhi "Ji Li Ji" the fuzzy statement of later generations caused misunderstanding.
【作者单位】： 南京师范大学文学院;
【分类号】：G256
，
本文编号：2279837
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/tushudanganlunwen/2279837.html
教材专著
