我国88家医学期刊编辑部伦理意识现状调查与组合评价

发布时间：2018-07-25 20:07

【摘要】：目的:了解我国医学期刊的编辑部伦理意识现状。方法:采用自制问卷调查88家医学期刊编辑部的伦理意识。通过文献分析、系统分析和两轮专家咨询确定了5个维度:投稿须知、初审阶段、外审阶段、稿件处理阶段、教育与培训;包括11个指标的评价体系。通过专家打分法确定指标的权重,采用层次分析法、TOPSIS法、秩和比法对编辑部伦理意识状况进行组合评价。结果:56家(63.6%)期刊在2010年的投稿须知中尚无涉及人的生物医学研究的伦理学要求。我国88家期刊中编辑部伦理意识为上档的有14家(15.9%),中档有45家(51.1%),下档有29家(33.0%)。不同主管部门的期刊在投稿须知、外审阶段2个维度的得分上差别有统计学意义(HC分别为10.175和7.305,P0.05);不同数据库来源的期刊在投稿须知、初审阶段、外审阶段、稿件处理阶段4个维度的得分上差别有统计学意义(HC分别为11.951,7.661,6.146,8.085,P0.05);不同数据库来源期刊的综合评价分档结果有统计学意义(HC=6.109,P0.05)。3种方法评价结果高度相关。结论:国内医学期刊编辑部对涉及人的医学研究的伦理意识有待提高。综合评价方法的组合评价较采用单一方法评价,结果更可靠、更贴近实际情况。
[Abstract]:Objective: to understand the present situation of ethical consciousness in the editorial department of Chinese medical journals. Methods: a self-designed questionnaire survey was conducted on the ethical consciousness of the editorial departments of 88 medical journals. Through literature analysis, systematic analysis and two rounds of expert consultation, five dimensions have been determined: input information, first trial stage, external review stage, manuscript processing stage, education and training, and the evaluation system of 11 indicators. The weight of the index is determined by the expert scoring method. The TOPSIS method and the rank sum ratio method are used to evaluate the ethical consciousness of the editorial department. Results 56 journals (63.6%) did not have the ethical requirements of biomedical research in 2010. Of the 88 journals in China, 14 (15.9%) have the highest ethical consciousness, 45 (51.1%) have the middle grade, and 29 (33.0%) have the lower grade. There were significant differences in the scores of the two dimensions between different departments in charge (HC = 10.175 and 7.305), while the journals from different database sources had significant differences in terms of input, initial review, and external review, respectively, and the difference was significant in the two dimensions (HC = 10.175 and 7.305, respectively), and the difference was significant between the two dimensions (HC = 10.175 and 7.305, respectively). There were significant differences in the scores of the four dimensions in the manuscript processing stage (HC = 11.951 / 7.661/ 6.146 / 8.085P0.05), and the comprehensive evaluation scores of journals from different database sources were statistically significant (HCC6.109 / P0.05). Conclusion: the ethical consciousness of the editorial department of Chinese medical journals needs to be improved. The combined evaluation of the comprehensive evaluation method is more reliable and closer to the actual situation than that of the single method.
【作者单位】：中南大学医学期刊编辑部;中南大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学系;中南大学湘雅二医院精神卫生研究所;
【基金】：湖南省哲学社会科学基金(14YBA395)~~
【分类号】：G239.2;G353.1

【相似文献】