2000-2014年我国图书馆书评研究发展述评
发布时间：2018-10-12 15:35
【摘要】：[目的/意义]系统梳理我国图书馆书评研究情况,从理论上推动书评本体性深入研究,从实践上推动图书馆的书评工作实践,将书评的三个层面作用更好地发挥出来。[方法/过程]以CNKI全文数据库2000-2014年图书馆界书评或书评工作相关论文为研究对象,根据时间发展进行阶段性深入分析。[结果/结论]图书馆书评相关研究在这15年间,经历了初始期、深入期、稳定期三个较显著的发展阶段,显示出整体研究低迷、本土研究占主流、鲜明的主题性模块式研究范式、凸显时代性与便捷性等特征,同时存在一些制约发展因素。从提高研究数量与质量、借鉴国外研究成果、提高理论与实证研究比重、开发新的主题性研究模块、关注与书评工作相关的隐性环节与问题等方面提出加强图书馆书评相关研究的对策。
[Abstract]:[purpose / significance] systematically combing the research situation of library book review in our country, promoting the study of book review ontology in theory, promoting the practice of book review in practice, and exerting the function of three layers of book review better. [method / process] taking the CNKI full-text database from 2000 to 2014 as the research object, this paper makes a thorough analysis according to the development of time. [results / conclusion] in the past 15 years, the library book review related research has experienced three significant stages of development: initial period, deep period and stable period, which shows that the overall research is in the doldrums, and the native study is the mainstream. The distinctive thematic modular research paradigm highlights the characteristics of the times and convenience, while there are some constraints on the development of the paradigm. In order to improve the quantity and quality of research, draw lessons from foreign research achievements, increase the proportion of theoretical and empirical research, and develop new thematic research modules, This paper puts forward some countermeasures to strengthen the research on book review in library from the aspects of recessive links and problems related to book review.
【作者单位】： 烟台大学图书馆;
【分类号】：G353.1
[Abstract]:[purpose / significance] systematically combing the research situation of library book review in our country, promoting the study of book review ontology in theory, promoting the practice of book review in practice, and exerting the function of three layers of book review better. [method / process] taking the CNKI full-text database from 2000 to 2014 as the research object, this paper makes a thorough analysis according to the development of time. [results / conclusion] in the past 15 years, the library book review related research has experienced three significant stages of development: initial period, deep period and stable period, which shows that the overall research is in the doldrums, and the native study is the mainstream. The distinctive thematic modular research paradigm highlights the characteristics of the times and convenience, while there are some constraints on the development of the paradigm. In order to improve the quantity and quality of research, draw lessons from foreign research achievements, increase the proportion of theoretical and empirical research, and develop new thematic research modules, This paper puts forward some countermeasures to strengthen the research on book review in library from the aspects of recessive links and problems related to book review.
【作者单位】： 烟台大学图书馆;
【分类号】：G353.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 朱俊波;梁光德;高尧;朱姝姗;;图书馆元数据拓展和关联著录方法研究[J];情报杂志;2011年08期
2 易立;古田;;对图书馆书评工作的现代化思考[J];图书馆杂志;2002年05期
3 许琳瑶;;“馆员书评”在全民阅读推广中的知识导航作用[J];图书馆杂志;2012年04期
4 封玮;谷丽萍;单承伟;;从功利到权利——为功利性阅读申辩[J];图书馆建设;2009年02期
5 张素;;建设专业书评系统 提高图书利用率[J];图书馆建设;2009年03期
6 曹力佳;;德国公共图书馆的书评合作服务及其启示[J];图书馆建设;2010年08期
7 沈颐;;建阅读社会,从书评开始[J];图书馆论坛;2006年01期
8 张永山;;充分发挥书评作用 提高图书利用率[J];图书馆论坛;2010年04期
9 刘艳苏;;高校图书馆读者书评数据库构建设想[J];图书馆论坛;2010年05期
10 南爱峰;;高校图书馆“校园原创书评数据库”建设研究[J];图书馆论坛;2011年04期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 付梅;刘娟;葛明贵;;新媒体时代阅读方式的转变与大学生阅读[J];安徽工业大学学报(社会科学版);2010年02期
2 耿丽霞;;全民阅读与图书馆服务策略[J];边疆经济与文化;2009年06期
3 刘波;林菲;;大学生网络阅读问题与对策分析[J];长春师范学院学报;2010年10期
4 高l，
本文编号：2266664
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenshubaike/kcsz/2266664.html
