硕士研究生学位论文文献综述的认知研究

发布时间：2018-04-20 11:30

本文选题：硕士研究生 + 文献综述　；参考：《华中师范大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：近年来,我国研究生教育蓬勃发展,培养规模不断扩大,培养方式日趋多样。但是在这种大规模扩招后,硕士研究生的培养质量越发受到公众的质疑。如何使硕士研究生的培养质量与其规模协调发展,是当前硕士研究生教育中亟待解决的问题。学位论文,是硕士学位资格认证的重要依据,也是衡量高校硕士研究生培养质量的重要内容之一。文献综述,作为硕士研究生学位论文必不可少的组成部分,在学位论文写作中举足轻重。文献综述的好坏直接关系到论文的成功与否,不仅与研究者研究能力有关,同样也与研究者对文献综述作用和功能的认识紧密相关。通过阅读相关文献,笔者发现目前关于硕士学位论文的研究主要集中在论文的引言和讨论部分,对文献综述部分的研究相对较少。对于文献综述的研究中,其内容主要集中在不同学科间文献综述语类结构和体裁特征以及英汉学术论文文献综述的对比分析上；在范围上,相关研究主要集中于博士和学士学位论文研究。纵观已有文献,笔者发现国内外对于文献综述的实证调查研究并不多,基本上没有对于中国硕士研究生文献综述整体认知现状的研究,因此本研究选取了华中师范大学120名硕士研究生为研究对象,旨在了解我国硕士研究生对文献综述的整体认知现状。本研究以问卷调查和小组访谈相结合的形式进行,研究问题如下：(1)硕士研究生对学位论文中文献综述的整体认知现状是什么?文科硕士和理科硕士研究生对于文献综述的认知是否存在差异?(2)硕士研究生在撰写文献综述过程中存在的普遍问题是什么?(3)针对存在的问题,我们可以采取哪些解决办法和改进措施?本研究发现,硕士研究生对学位论文中文献综述的认知在宏观上显示出较高水平,即对文献综述的地位、作用有清晰的认识。微观层面上,文科硕士和理科硕士对文献综述的目的和功能有较高的认知,而对文献综述的标准和规范方面,呈现出中等偏低水平的认知现状。此外,文科硕士和理科硕士对于文献综述的认知存在差异,在文献综述的目的和功能、文献综述的写作原则、文献综述的标准和规范以及文献综述的具体内容方面,文科硕士的认知水平普遍高于理科硕士。本研究还显示硕士研究生在撰写文献综述过程中存在的普遍问题主要集中在文献搜集,文献分析综合以及具体撰写综述方面。根据对问卷和访谈结果的分析,本研究从自身态度、课程设置、教师指导三方面提出了相应的改进措施。本次调查研究,可以从一定程度上反映出国内硕士研究生对学位论文中文献综述的认知现状,调查研究的结果还为相关课程设置,教师辅助指导提供启示,对提高硕士研究生学位论文文献综述写作水平以及学位论文质量具有现实的指导意义。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the graduate education in China has developed vigorously, the scale of training is expanding and the ways of training are increasingly diverse. However, after this large-scale enrollment expansion, the quality of graduate students' training has been questioned by the public. How to make the quality of the graduate students in harmony with their scale is an urgent problem to be solved in the present postgraduate education. The thesis is an important basis for the qualification certification of master's degree, and also one of the important contents to measure the quality of graduate students in Colleges and universities. Literature review, as an indispensable part of master's degree thesis, plays an important role in the writing of dissertations. The literature review is directly related to the success of the thesis. It is not only related to the researchers' research ability, but also closely related to the researchers' understanding of the role and function of literature review. Through the reading of relevant literature, I found that the current research on master's dissertations is mainly focused on the introduction and discussion part of the paper, and the research on the literature review is relatively less. In the course of the study, its contents are mainly concentrated on the comparative analysis of the structure and genre characteristics of literature review and the literature review of English and Chinese academic papers. Not much, basically there is no research on the overall cognitive status of Chinese postgraduate literature review. Therefore, this study selects 120 graduate students from Huazhong Normal University as the research object, and aims to understand the overall cognitive status of the master graduate students in the literature review in China. This study is based on the combination of questionnaire survey and group interview. The following questions are as follows: (1) what is the overall cognitive status of the master's graduate students in the literature review of the dissertations? Are there any differences in the cognition of the literature review by the master of Arts and the master of science? (2) what are the common problems in the process of writing a literature review? (3) in view of the existing problems, we can What are the solutions and measures to be taken? This study found that the master's degree of literature review in the dissertations shows a high level of cognition, that is, the status of literature review and the clear understanding of its role. At the micro level, the master of Arts and science master have a higher understanding of the purpose and function of the literature review, In terms of the standard and standard of literature review, there is a medium and low level of cognition. In addition, there are differences in the cognition of literature review, the purpose and function of literature review, the writing principle of literature review, the standard and standard of literature review, and the specific content of literature review. The cognitive level of the scholar is generally higher than that of the science master. This study also shows that the general problems in the process of writing literature are mainly concentrated on the literature collection, the comprehensive literature analysis and the specific writing summary. According to the analysis of the questionnaire and the interview results, this research is from its own attitude, course setting, and teacher guidance three. The research can reflect the cognitive status of the domestic graduate students on the literature review in the dissertations to a certain extent. The results of the investigation are also provided for the relevant courses, the teacher assisted guidance provides inspiration, and the level of literature review of the graduate degree thesis and the level of literature review. The quality of academic dissertations is of practical guiding significance.

【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：G643.8

【相似文献】