企业信件格式_52sci论文投稿信件模板

发布时间：2016-11-02 16:46

本文关键词：论文投稿信件，，由笔耕文化传播整理发布。

Bestregards,；Rose小木虫论坛精彩奉献打造学术最前沿；小木虫论坛精彩奉献；打造学术最前沿；小木虫论坛精彩奉献；打造学术最前沿；小木虫论坛精彩奉献；打造学术最前沿；小木虫论坛，打造学术最前沿；小木虫论坛精彩奉献没有出席会议，索要论文集；背景：会议论文被录用，但没有出席会议，对方邮寄了；我的去信：打造学术最前沿；DearSea

Best regards,

Rose 小木虫论坛精彩奉献打造学术最前沿

小木虫论坛精彩奉献

打造学术最前沿

小木虫论坛精彩奉献

打造学术最前沿

小木虫论坛精彩奉献

打造学术最前沿

小木虫论坛，打造学术最前沿

小木虫论坛精彩奉献没有出席会议，索要论文集

背景：会议论文被录用，但没有出席会议，对方邮寄了光盘，询问是否有纸质论文集。

我的去信：打造学术最前沿

Dear Sean

Thanks for sending the CD-ROM copy, but I have not received the book (the prodeedings), I want to know whether a book should be included .

As you know, the printed copy would be more believable and useful as a reference,If I want one how much it cost? thank you

Best wishes

Jinke 小木虫论坛精彩奉献打造学术最前沿

对方回信：小木虫论坛精彩奉献

打造学术最前沿 Hello Dr. A printed version is 125 plus whatever shipping and currency conversion costs. They can be ordered and paid for through the same route as previously. Cheers Dr. Sean D. Dessureault

2005 APCOM Chairman

小木虫论坛精彩奉献

打造学术最前沿

小木虫论坛，打造学术最前沿

小木虫论坛精彩奉献

产品中农药残留检测付费事宜打造学术最前沿背景：我没有具体的和老外们联系讨论过什么投稿啊参加会议的事情,但是有过很多和他们联系其他相关事宜的情况.以下是和某德国实验室

联系的E-mail,小讨论的是在按照产品中农药残留检测已经付相关费木虫论 EP,坛精彩奉献

用的问题.希望也可以对大家有所借鉴! 打造学术最前沿

我的去信：

小木虫论坛精彩奉献

打造学术最前沿

小木虫论坛精彩奉献

打造学术最前沿 Dear ****, I am oe work for ooCo., Ltd. I have recevied the fax about analysis payment. Could you give me detail information about your bank account. So that I can pay as soon as possible. Best Wishes, ***** 老外的回信： Dear *****, attached you find the invoice for the analysis of pesticide residues including bank account information. In case of any questions please don't hesitate to contact me.

Best regards

****

小木虫论坛，打造学术最前沿

小木虫论坛精彩奉献

版权转让声明及确认校样打造学术最前沿

打造学术最前沿背景：论文已被接收，编辑要求我提供签名的版权申明和确认校样，我与编辑之间的通信。我的去信： Dear editor, I've gone through this article and found a wrong word. The 143th line the word "m" shoud be "the". I noted it in the query form. Please give me a back e-mail. Thank you very much. Best wishes.

Yours,

*** 小木虫论坛精彩奉献

老外的回复：小木虫论坛精彩奉献

打造学术最前沿 Dear Dr. ***, I hereby acknowledge the safe receipt of the corrections. Thank you for your cooperation. Yours sincerely,

****

我的再去信：

Dear ****,

I've read carefully the 'Transfer of copyright agreement' and signed it. Now

I e-mailed it to you.In addition,we will not order the offprints at the present time.

Please send me a back e-mail if you receive this messenge. Thank you very

much!

Yours sincerely,

*** 小木虫论坛精彩奉献打造学术最前沿

小木虫论坛，打造学术最前沿

老外的再回复：通知我版权申明已经收到

Dear ***,

I hereby acknowledge the safe receipt of the signed copyright form.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Yours sincerely,

****

审稿人意见小木虫论坛精彩奉献

背景：老外发给我的审稿人意见及mail 打造学术最前沿老外的email: Dear***,

Please find enclosed the re-review from one of the previous reviewers of your manuscript. As you can see, he is now in favor of publishing your article if you can modify your paper to answer his questions.

If you feel that you can answer his questions appropriately, then please provide a revised manuscript based on the recommendations of the reviewers together with a disk or CD of the revision using a standard word processing program. You must also send along with the revision a cover letter that details your responses to each point in the reviewers' comments.

Thank you once again for your interest in Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. I am sorry for the delay in processing your manuscript.

Doinit L. Sr. 小木虫论坛精彩奉献打造学术最前沿

老外的审稿意见：小木虫论坛精彩奉献打造学术最前沿 Reviewer Comments for USAM 2005.6 Title of Paper: *** Authors: *** Ref. No. USAM2005.6

RECOMMENDATION: PUBLISH WITH REVISION

I appreciate the progress and effort that the authors have made. I note some significant progress in this revised article. By replacing "new" with the word of "simple", I take back my argument about the novelty of the method in making soft metal nanoparticles, because it is the first article that report to pulverizing Sn metal into the size as small as 50 nm. Maybe the word "facile" is more appropriate.

I am still having trouble understanding the mechanism of the formation of Sn nanoparticle proposed by the author. Because the hardness of Sn is 1.5 in mineralogical scale, where Mg and Zn have 2.5 (Samsonov, G.V. "Handbook of the Physicochemical Properties of the Elements" IFI/Plenum, 1968, pp. 432), it is not surprising that Sn can be pulverizing into small particles under high-intensity of ultrasound. What I have trouble with is that the surface area should not be large enough to have the authors worried about in reducing the surface energy of particles with aggregation (I calculated the surface area of Sn particles at 50 nm is c.a. 12 m2/g). I really don't think the oxide coating and solvent molecules would depress the aggregation because I don't think there would be aggregation occurring.

Overall, it is my opinion that the article should be published if the authors can clarify the question about the mechanism of aggregation.

Please note that the references are not uniform in format from No 15 down. 小木虫论坛精彩奉献打造学术最前沿小木虫论坛，打造学术最前沿

下载地址：52sci论文投稿信件模板.Doc

　　【】