政治环境视野下的三十年代“文艺自由论辩”

发布时间：2018-01-11 10:25

本文关键词：政治环境视野下的三十年代“文艺自由论辩”　出处：《山东师范大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：20世纪30年代是中国社会发生重大转变的时期,中国面临着内忧外患的双重危机。随着国共两党政治势力上的发展需求,双方的政治斗争日趋激烈。30年代初,胡秋原、苏汶与左联展开的“文艺自由论辩”深受30年代政治背景、时代环境的影响。因此笔者深入到这场论辩背后的时代环境,对这场文艺论争发生的原因,发展的过程进行更为全面的阐释,以此来呈现这场论争的丰富性。1931年至1933年,左联与胡秋原、苏汶进行的关于文艺自由问题的论辩,并不是文艺发展的单行线,它是文化与政治多重复杂因素的组合体。20世纪30年代,国际和中国国内政治形势发生了巨大改变,国民党随着政治发展的需要,文学也随之纳入政治言说的体系内,成为为政治服务的手段之一。进入30年代,作家和文艺理论家不仅要在内忧外患的政治环境中生存,而且其文学道路和文学理念受到政治环境的影响。由胡秋原引发的这场文艺自由论辩的发生,正是基于政治环境下文学价值的转变。在论争过程中,左联一方做出的决策以及改变都离不开当时政治环境的影响。政治斗争的形势下,国共两党的文化策略,党派人员对文艺的干预,以及形成的政治化的文学审美标准与价值空间,既是这一论争发生的背景,也是影响与推动这一论争发展的重要因素。这一文艺论争发生、发展的背后离不开当时的时代环境,因此笔者把这场文艺论争放置在当时的政治环境之下来探究。笔者论文的第一章从论争的缘起出发,通过分析30年代的政治环境,以及政治环境下的文坛形势,国共两党的文艺政策等方面来探究论争发生的背景以及原因。基于当时的文化环境,胡秋原发表文章来批判当时过分化的文坛景象,同时在政治斗争激烈的环境中,胡秋原的言论引起了左联的注意,引发了左联与胡秋原的论争。第二章主要分析30年代的政治环境对左联的文艺理论的影响。在当时的政治斗争环境下,左联性质决定了与胡秋原、苏汶不同的立场,使其在文艺问题上产生了巨大分歧。同时,左联政治性的思维,使其对胡秋原、苏汶的言论衍生出文艺之外的理解。第三章主要论述政治环境对论争发展趋势的影响。在论争过程中,左联成员对胡秋原、苏汶所表现出的不同态度,以及后期左联成员对论争态度的缓和与当时的政治环境和政治发展的需要相关。通过这几个方面的分析以此来展现这一文艺论争过程的发展并不是单一的,而是深受时代政治环境因素的影响。30年代初期,左联与胡秋原、苏汶的这场文艺论辩的发生与当时的政治环境紧密相关。因此笔者在政治环境视角下探究这一文学论争,通过查阅参与论争的人员的文章去全面的展开这场论争,去挖掘论争发生的时代根源,文学论争的时代诉求与意义。笔者以文学论争的发生、发展过程为基点,来探究政治环境因素对其产生的多重影响,展现这一文艺论争的政治与文化方面的多面性与多重价值。
[Abstract]:1930s is China big changes in society period, China face a double crisis. Domestic trouble and foreign invasion with the development needs of the KMT political forces on both sides, the fierce political struggle in the early.30, Hu Qiuyuan, Su Wen and the expansion of the "literary free debate" in 30s by the political background, the influence of the social environment. Therefore the author behind this debate era, the reasons of literary debates occur, the process of development of a more comprehensive interpretation, so as to present this debate the richness of.1931 to 1933, and the Hu Qiuyuan, Su Wen on the issue of artistic freedom and the development of literature debate, not a single line and it is the political and cultural complex factors in the.20 century in 30s, great changes have taken place in the international and domestic political situation China, the Kuomintang with politics. The needs of the development of literature, also will be incorporated into the political discourse system, become one of the political means. In 30s, the writers and literary theorists must not only survive in the domestic trouble and foreign invasion of the political environment, and the road of literature and literary ideas influenced by political environment. By Hu Qiuyuan triggered by the literature on the freedom of the occurrence of it is a change of the political environment based on the value of literature. During the debate, the party made the decision and change all cannot do without the political environment at that time. The political struggle situation, cultural strategy between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party, the party personnel intervention on literature and art, and the formation of political literature aesthetic standard and value is space, the controversy occurred in the background, is also an important factor affecting and promoting the development of debate. This literary controversy occurred behind the development cannot do without the time The environment, so I put it down in the literary inquiry placed the political environment at that time. The author of the first chapter of the thesis from the origin of the controversy, in 30s through the analysis of the political environment and the political environment of the literary world situation, the KMT's literary policy and other aspects to explore the background and reason of controversy. At the time of the culture based on the environment, Hu Qiuyuan published an article criticizing the literary scene at that time had differentiation in the political struggle at the same time, in the fierce environment, Hu Qiuyuan's remarks caused the attention, caused the controversy with Hu Qiuyuan. The second chapter mainly analyzes the influence of the political environment of the 30s literary theory. At the time of the political struggle next, the nature of Hu Qiuyuan and Su Wen, different positions, which produced a huge difference in the problem. At the same time, the political thinking, the Hu Qiuyuan, Su Wen's speech derived from outside the literary understanding. The third chapter discusses the influence of the political environment on the development trend of the debate. During the debate, the members of Hu Qiuyuan, Su Wen showed different attitudes, and later the members of the debate with slow attitude when the political environment and political the development of related. Through the analysis of the several aspects in order to show the development and the process of literary debate is not a single, but by the time the political environment influencing factors of.30 in the early 1990s, leftist and Hu Qiuyuan, had a literary argument of Su Wen and closely related to the political environment at that time. So the author explore the literature from the perspective of political debate in the environment, through consulting personnel participating in the debate of the article to start the debate completely, to dig the root of times controversy occurred, the era of literature debate v. Based on the occurrence and development process of literary debate, the author explores the multiple influences of political and environmental factors on it, and reveals the multifaceted and multiple values of the political and cultural aspects of this literary debate.

【学位授予单位】：山东师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I206.6

【参考文献】