《白鹿原》的中国土地革命书写——陈忠实思想矛盾的症候式分析

发布时间：2018-01-16 07:36

本文关键词：《白鹿原》的中国土地革命书写——陈忠实思想矛盾的症候式分析　出处：《河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：《白鹿原》在对待土地革命的态度方面显示出价值立场的含混,这种含混是作者陈忠实思想矛盾的反映。作品不突出描写大地主和地租剥削,只写"财东"的雇工,这符合"关中模式"的历史事实;但它对高利贷剥削的付之阙如却耐人寻味。它对地主发家史、地主与农民关系的描述意在解构"典范土地革命叙事"对地主形象的恶霸化、流氓无赖化处理,但客观上也写出了权势对于地主家庭地位和财富的重要性,并承认"恶绅村盖子"的存在。我们肯定《白鹿原》的真实性,却不宜将白鹿原当作土改前中国农村社会的标本、将白嘉轩式地主视为中国所有地主的典型代表。《白鹿原》具备了一定的复调性,但还算不上真正意义上的复调小说。
[Abstract]:White Deer Plains shows ambiguity in his attitude to the agrarian revolution, which is a reflection of the author's contradiction in his thoughts. His works do not highlight the description of large landlords and land rent exploitation. Only the employees who wrote "Caidong" accord with the historical fact of "Guanzhong Model"; However, its lack of exploitation of usury is intriguing. Its description of the landlord's family history and the relationship between the landlord and the peasants is intended to deconstruct the "canonical land revolution narrative" to the landlord's image as a bully and a rogue to deal with it. But objectively, we also write about the importance of power to the landlords' family status and wealth, and acknowledge the existence of the "evil gentry village lid." We affirm the authenticity of the White Deer Plains. However, it is not appropriate to regard the white deer as a specimen of Chinese rural society before the land reform, and to regard the Baijiaxuan landowner as a typical representative of all the landlords in China. But it's not really polyphonic fiction.
【作者单位】：河北大学文学院;
【基金】：河北省社会科学基金项目“中国土改文学叙事伦理研究”(HB16WX010)
【分类号】：I207.425
【正文快照】： 读《白鹿原》,看陈忠实对人物与故事的艺术处理,会发现其诸多含混矛盾之处,比如作者对儒家文化的理解与评价,对田小娥的基本态度和情感倾向:以五四启蒙主义观点看,田小娥是值得同情的悲剧人物,是封建文化和礼教制度的牺牲品,白嘉轩和鹿三是使其走向死路的罪魁祸首,他们对田小

【相似文献】