在“科学”与“人文”之间——五四新文化倡导话语辨析

发布时间：2018-01-16 12:18

本文关键词：在“科学”与“人文”之间——五四新文化倡导话语辨析　出处：《齐鲁学刊》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：五四新文化倡导期间,足以代表"科学话语"的是中国科学社及其《科学》月刊,但该刊主持者之一任鸿隽是以文学革命"反对者"的面孔出现的,《科学》在话语层面与《新青年》相对立。与《科学》的"科学话语"的对立显然不利于偏重"人文话语"的《新青年》的新文化倡导,如把"灵学"视为"迷信",而与"科学"相对立。改变《新青年》与《科学》之间话语隔阂的,是1917年出任北大校长的蔡元培,而真正实现"人文话语"与"科学话语"相联系的是胡适。但是,对于五四新文化倡导而言,实现"科学"与"人文"之统一与融合,仍然是一个远没有解决的问题。
[Abstract]:During the period of the May 4th New Culture Advocacy, it was the Science Society of China and its "Science" monthly magazine that could represent the "scientific discourse", but Ren Hongjun, one of the moderators of the journal, appeared as the face of the "opponents" of the literary revolution. "Science" is opposite to "New Youth" at the discourse level, and the opposition to "Scientific discourse" of "Science" is obviously unfavorable to the new cultural advocacy of "New Youth", which emphasizes "Humanistic discourse". For example, "spiritual study" is regarded as "superstition", but is opposed to "science". It is Cai Yuanpei, who became president of Peking University in 1917, who changed the gap between "New Youth" and "Science". The real realization of "human discourse" and "scientific discourse" is Hu Shi. However, for the May 4th New Culture, the unity and integration of "Science" and "Humanism" are realized. It is still a far from solved problem.
【作者单位】：华中师范大学文学院;
【分类号】：I206.6
【正文快照】： 一五四新文化倡导期间,最足以代表“科学话语”的,无疑是中国科学社及其《科学》月刊,但该社及该刊主持者之一任鸿隽,却是以文学革命“反对者”的面孔出现在《青年杂志》/《新青年》新文化倡导运动中的。胡适后来自述“个人主张文学革命的小史”,说载于《新青年》第2卷第5号的

【参考文献】