《〈使至塞上〉与崔希逸破吐蕃事无关》求疵

发布时间：2018-01-17 21:12

本文关键词：《〈使至塞上〉与崔希逸破吐蕃事无关》求疵　出处：《历史研究》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：正《历史研究》2014年第2期"读史札记"栏目发表的戴伟华《〈使至塞上〉与崔希逸破吐蕃事无关》一文(以下简称"戴文")说,两《唐书》及《资治通鉴》(以下简称《通鉴》)所载,河西节度使崔希逸破吐蕃的时间在开元二十五年(737)二月或三月有误,根据《全唐文》卷352樊衡《河西破蕃贼露布》(下文简称《露布》)这一"极其珍贵"的史料,崔希逸破吐蕃的时间应在开元二十五年十二月。戴文的结论是:"(崔希逸)袭击吐蕃时间不是《通鉴》、两《唐书》所说的二月或三月。旧史所记时间是误读,十二月写为二月或三月,并无深意。据吐蕃
[Abstract]:Is history research >2014 second "reading notes" column published by Dai Weihua "to the frontier" and "Cui Xiyi breaking things unrelated to the Tibet > (hereinafter referred to as" Devine "), two < > and < > Tangshu Zizhitongjian (hereinafter referred to as the" mirror ") contained in Hexi, Cui Xiyi breaking time in Tibet Kaiyuan twenty-five years (737) February or March, according to the" full tang > volume 352 in Hexi fan Heng fan Loubu > < broken thief (hereinafter referred to as < > Loubu) this "extremely precious historical materials," Cui Xiyi broken Tubo Period should be in Kaiyuan twenty-five years in December. The conclusion is: "Devine (Cui Xiyi) is not the time to attack Tibet < two < > > Jian, Tang said in February or March. The old history is written time is December or February for misreading, written in March, there is no meaning. According to Tibet

【作者单位】：中国社会科学院文学研究所;
【分类号】：I207.22;K242.2
【正文快照】： 陈铁民《历史研究》2014年第2期“读史札记”栏目发表的戴伟华《〈使至塞上〉与崔希逸破吐蕃事无关》一文(以下简称“戴文”)说,两《唐书》及《资治通鉴》(以下简称《通鉴》)所载,河西节度使崔希逸破吐蕃的时间在开元二十五年(737)二月或三月有误,根据《全唐文》卷352樊衡《河

【相似文献】