新生活运动的话语研究

发布时间：2018-03-21 12:30

本文选题：新生活运动　切入点：反讽　出处：《西南大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：新生活运动作为国民政府特殊处境下的一种策略性社会改良运动,包含了多种话语,“礼义廉耻”这四德作为新生活运动的基本精神被重新征用,并且由蒋介石做出了详细的解释。此外,基督教义、法西斯理念与日本武士道精神也以或隐或显的姿态藏身其间。新生活运动以“清洁”、“卫生”、“军事化”、“礼义廉耻”等标语形式现身于蒋介石、宋美龄、黄仁霖等新运主要推行人员的演讲中,也隐现于广告标语、宣传手册、电影、演讲等各种宣传媒介。相比于新生活运动的内容与理论架构,人们更为熟悉的是新生活运动的各种宣传标语。不管是对新生活运动的社会舆论,还是对新生活运动的文学书写,抑或是政党威权下的遵命文章,新生活运动都以标语化、符码化的方式而存在。新生活运动的浪潮由南昌波及全国,铺天盖地的报刊报导和民众舆论更使其在国民社会中产生了一定程度的影响。然而一个颇有意味的现象是,在民间舆论热潮掀起的同时,当时的知识分子对其却是“冷处理”,作家、学者们对全国范围的新生活运动少有正面回应,其所秉持的态度不甚明了。这种现象是本文探讨的出发点。论者试图从当时的社会舆论进入新生活运动,即时性的评论保留了知识分子对于社会的观感和人生理念。首先,经由翻检报刊杂志对新生活运动的时评讨论,对多种言说方式进行分类。从某种层面来说,时评可以代表社会舆论对新生活运动的认知,但由于新生活运动的推行部门是国民政府,其很大程度上管控着新闻的生产与传播。其次,通过检视有关新生活运动的文学书写,分析作家对于新生活运动的复杂态度。作家凭借符码化的写作策略将新生活运动标语嵌入文本之中,以反讽的修辞对新生活运动新与旧的双重面孔和话语传播的虚伪性进行了有力的披露。出于男性权威和政党话语对女性的塑造,作家和新生活运动倡导者在反摩登主题上达成共识。最后,从整体上阐释知识分子在新生活运动推行时期的困境,国难深重的现实激发了民族国家话语的兴起,而不同政党话语之间的抵触与阻抗又让处于边缘地位的知识分子难以抉择。
[Abstract]:The New Life Movement, as a kind of strategic social reform movement under the special situation of the National Government, contains a variety of words. As the basic spirit of the New Life Movement, the four virtues of "courtesy, righteousness, integrity and shame" have been requisitioned again. And Jiang Jieshi made a detailed explanation. In addition, Christian meaning, The Fascist idea and the Bushido spirit of Japan also hide in an implicit or explicit manner. The New Life Movement appears in the form of slogans such as "cleanliness", "hygiene", "militarization" and "courtesy and integrity" in Jiang Jieshi, Song Mei-ling, etc. Huang Renlin and other new sports practitioners have made speeches, but they have also hidden in advertising slogans, brochures, films, speeches, and other media. Compared with the content and theoretical framework of the New Life Movement, What people are more familiar with is the various propaganda slogans of the New Life Movement, whether it is the public opinion about the New Life Movement, the literary writing of the New Life Movement, or the obeying articles under the authoritarianism of the political party. The wave of the new life movement spread from Nanchang to the whole country, and the overwhelming press reports and public opinion made it even more influential in civil society to a certain extent. However, it is quite meaningful that, At the same time as the upsurge of public opinion was raised, the intellectuals at that time were "cold" to it. Writers and scholars rarely responded positively to the nationwide new life movement. The attitude it holds is not very clear. This phenomenon is the starting point of this paper. The theorists try to enter the new life movement from the public opinion at that time, and the immediate comments retain the intellectuals' perception of society and the concept of life. First of all, By reviewing the current reviews of the New Life Movement in newspapers and magazines, we classify various modes of speech. On a certain level, the commentary can represent the public opinion's cognition of the New Life Movement. However, since the new life movement was promoted by the national government, it controlled the production and dissemination of news to a large extent. Secondly, by examining the literary writing of the new life movement, This paper analyzes the writer's complex attitude towards the new life movement. With the help of the codec writing strategy, the writer embed the new life movement slogan in the text. This paper makes a powerful disclosure of the double faces of the new life movement and the old and new ones and the hypocrisy of the discourse spread with ironic rhetoric, which is based on the male authority and the portrayal of the female by the party discourse. The writers and the advocates of the New Life Movement reached a consensus on the theme of anti-modern. Finally, it explained the plight of the intellectuals during the implementation of the New Life Movement as a whole, and the serious reality of the national crisis inspired the rise of the nation-state discourse. The conflict and resistance between different political parties make it difficult for the marginalized intellectuals to choose.
【学位授予单位】：西南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I206.6

【参考文献】