王樵《尚书日记》研究

发布时间：2018-04-22 07:29

本文选题：王樵 + 《尚书日记》　；参考：《重庆师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：王樵《尚书日记》是明代《尚书》学的著闻之作。笔者前后经眼该书六个版本:万历十年于明照刻本、万历二十三年彭燧刻本、万历二十五年蔡立身刻本、万历王锡琛重修本、崇祯五年庄继光重修本、文渊阁《四库全书》本。其中,于本在著书体例与文本内容上与后诸版本差别甚大,可单独视为一个版本系统。后一版本系统以彭本为祖本。将于本和彭本视作前后系统的代表来对比,可以窥观王樵修改《日记》之部分情况,进而发现作者日渐醇熟的《书》学见识和著述动机由诠释文本向关怀现实的侧重。蔡本为彭本的重刻本,对彭本之误稍有订正,因此讹误最少,可作为整理底本之选。四库本讹、脱、衍、倒诸误较多,致误原因繁杂,尤其是因政治原因而产生的改窜,常常令文本失去原意,故而引用之时应当谨慎。《日记》之解经特色既有承自前人之成分,如训诂与义理并重、兼涉考证和阙疑原则,又受明代思潮走向和晚明社会局势影响,表现出注重心性工夫和不拘于经文,参以历史,贴近现实的特点。与之相对应地,《日记》之解经思想则主要可归为两橛:以心为主、以敬为核的心性工夫和通经致用、裨补现实的经世思想。若从宏观的学术史与思想史的角度,联系明代中晚期学风思潮窥观王樵及其《日记》,则《日记》中的汉学(训诂与考据)成就,不能说没有受到明代中后期学风渐变的影响;认识到心学的狂肆对社会人心的破坏后,王樵在更加重视朱学“主敬”工夫论时,突出个体在德性养成中的主体性与能动性,契合明代整体思想逐渐内转的趋向;同时,在感受到本朝山雨欲来的危机局势时,作为官员型学者的他借鉴前贤,立足当下,既强调从道德层面规范社会风气,又主张以实务精神与行政技能推动国家体制、机制的改革与完善。由此,王樵及其《日记》或可视作明代中晚期汉宋学、朱王学、道器学之变化整合的一个具体个案。
[Abstract]:Wang Qiao's Diary of Shang Shu is a masterpiece of the study of Shang Shu in Ming Dynasty. The author before and after six editions of the book: Wanli ten years in Ming Zhao, Wanli 23 years Peng Sui engraved, Wanli 25 years Cai Li-Shen engraved, Wanli Wang Xichen, Chongzhen five years Chuang Jiguang revision, Wen Yuan GE < Siku >. Among them, Yu Ben in the style of writing and text content and the latter versions are very different, can be considered as a separate version system. The latter version of the system is based on Peng Ben. By comparing this book with Peng Ben as the representative of the system before and after, we can see some of Wang Qiao's revision of the Diary, and then find out that the author's knowledge and motivation of learning and writing from the text to the care of reality is more and more important. Cai Ben is Peng Ben's reprint, a slight correction to Peng Ben's error, therefore, the least error, can be used as the choice of finishing the original version. There are many errors in the original books, especially in the political reasons, which often make the text lose its original intention, so it should be used with caution. The characteristics of the interpretation of the "Diary" have some elements which are inherited from the predecessors. For example, both exegesis and justice, and the principles of textual research and doubt, are influenced by the trend of thought in the Ming Dynasty and the social situation in the late Ming Dynasty, showing the characteristics of paying attention to mental work and not taking into account scriptures, referring to history and approaching the reality. Correspondingly, the thought of "Diary" can be classified into two chunks: the heart is the main part, the heart is the core and the meridian is used to complement the practical thoughts of the world. From the point of view of macroscopic academic history and ideological history, we can see Wang Qiao's view of the style of study in the middle and late Ming Dynasty and his Diary, then the achievements of Sinology (exegesis and textual research) in Diary can not be said to have been influenced by the gradual change of the style of study in the middle and late Ming Dynasty. Recognizing the destruction of the social people caused by the madness of the study of the mind, when Wang Qiao paid more attention to the theory of "master and respect" in Zhu's study, he highlighted the subjectivity and initiative of the individual in the cultivation of virtue, which was in line with the tendency of the whole thought of the Ming Dynasty gradually turning inwards; at the same time, When he felt the crisis situation coming from the mountains and rain, he, as an official scholar, drew lessons from his predecessors and established himself at the present time, emphasizing not only standardizing social ethos from the moral level, but also advocating the promotion of the state system with practical spirit and administrative skills. Reform and perfection of mechanism. Therefore, Wang Qiao and his Diary may be regarded as a concrete case of the change and integration of Han and Song studies, Zhu Wangxue and Taoism in the middle and late Ming Dynasty.
【学位授予单位】：重庆师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I207.62

【参考文献】