《史通》的文学研究
本文选题:《史通》 + 叙事 ; 参考:《东北师范大学》2015年硕士论文
【摘要】:本文主要探讨唐代史学家刘知几的著作《史通》中涉及的文学观念,主要以《史通》中谈到的叙事手法、叙事观念和刘知几的文史观为论述主体首先,简要介绍了刘知几作为史学家在文学昌盛的年代的生活经历,影响他文史观念的唐代文风,以及《史通》的主要内容,以便于后文更好地展开论述。其次,举例论述了《史通》中刘知几谈及到的四种叙事手法,分别是预叙、呼应、补叙和互见,研究刘知几对这几种叙事手法优劣的褒贬态度。刘知几对叙事手法的认识相对超前,但其对于这几种手法的作用和目的的理解,是有局限的。再次,论述了刘知几从史学家的角度对于历史叙事的观点。鉴于文学与历史的相通之处,他的看法对于文学的叙事创作也有重要的借鉴价值和意义,本文除研究刘知几的几种叙事观念:实录直书、尚简用晦、言必近真、文质辨洽和模拟之说以外,还论述了其对于文学创作的可借鉴之处:如何加强文学的社会作用,文辞简练与生动形象的把握,文辞华丽与质朴的平衡,人物语言风格的虚与实的作用与得失,文学模仿的技巧等等。最后,探讨文学与历史的同源而生与各行其道的发展历程。刘知几在《史通》中也谈到了这一现象,鉴于《史通》作为史学的著作对于文学的发展有着重要的意义,所以我们倡导文学与史学在各行其道的情况下应该打破壁垒,互相借鉴,共同进步。
[Abstract]:This paper mainly discusses the literary ideas involved in Liu Zhiji's works "Shi Tong" in Tang Dynasty, and mainly discusses the narrative techniques, narrative ideas and Liu Zhi-ji 's literary and historical views as the main body of the discussion, first of all, the narrative techniques, the narrative ideas and the literary and historical views of Liu Zhiji, a historian of the Tang Dynasty. This paper briefly introduces the life experience of Liu Zhiji as a historian in the age of literary prosperity, the literary style of Tang Dynasty, which influenced his conception of literary history, and the main contents of Shi Tong, so as to better discuss the later articles. Secondly, this paper gives an example of the four narrative techniques mentioned by Liu Zhiji in Shi Tong, which are prenarration, echo, resuscitation and mutual view, and studies Liu Zhiji's favorable and negative attitudes towards these narrative techniques. Liu Zhiji's understanding of narrative techniques is relatively advanced, but his understanding of the functions and purposes of these techniques is limited. Thirdly, it discusses Liu Zhiji's views on historical narration from the perspective of historians. In view of the similarities between literature and history, his views also have important reference value and significance for the narrative creation of literature. In addition to the theory of quality differentiation and simulation, this paper also discusses its reference for literary creation: how to strengthen the social function of literature, how to grasp the concise and vivid images of literary works, and the balance between ornate and plain prose. The function, gain and loss of the fictitious and real language style of the characters, the skill of literary imitation and so on. Finally, the development of literature and history is discussed. Liu Zhiji also talked about this phenomenon in "Shi Tong". In view of the important significance of "Shi Tong" as a work of historiography to the development of literature, we advocate that literature and historiography should break down barriers when they go their own way. Learn from each other and make common progress.
【学位授予单位】:东北师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:I206.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 石伟伟;;先秦两汉史传文学体裁体例之浅析[J];太原城市职业技术学院学报;2013年11期
2 胡益祥;刘知几的编辑观——中国第一部古典编辑学《史通》述评[J];河南大学学报(社会科学版);1991年02期
3 代继华;;《四库全书总目》“史部”中的《史通》[J];华南师范大学学报(社会科学版);2007年06期
4 赵海旺;;张舜徽先生与《史通》研究[J];淮阴师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年01期
5 郭绍林;刘知几《史通》所建立的历史编纂学体系[J];洛阳师专学报;1995年04期
6 吕海龙;;《史通》所论叙事手法举隅[J];名作欣赏;2013年36期
7 孙振田;;《史通》向、歆“续《史记》”解[J];图书馆理论与实践;2013年11期
8 董乃斌;;论中国文学史抒情和叙事两大传统[J];社会科学;2010年03期
9 徐兴海;刘知几对《史记》的批评[J];陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1999年01期
10 杨绪敏;;论明清时期《史通》的流传、整理和研究[J];史学月刊;2008年11期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 吕海龙;《史通》与刘知几文史观研究[D];上海大学;2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 周征;刘知几《史通》叙事理论研究[D];山东大学;2006年
2 涂耀威;《史通》史著文辞观初探[D];华中师范大学;2007年
,本文编号:2091394
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyuyanwenxuelunwen/2091394.html