《诗比兴笺》研究三题
发布时间：2018-07-23 17:14
【摘要】：诗歌选本的编纂活动在明清时异常活跃。《诗比兴笺》作为其一,长时间存在著作权争议,直至近年才得以厘清,实为魏源所著。作为独一一部反映魏源诗学观念的古诗选本,《诗比兴笺》多选汉、魏、唐时期为世人所公认的比兴体诗,并加以笺释。较之其他诗歌选本,选诗数量虽少,但颇具特点。本文认为《诗比兴笺》“以人选诗”,尤其关注入选诗人的道德品格。此种选诗标准与魏源受公羊学“尊王”思想,重视文学创作者的道德修养及自身浓重的爱国主义思想有着莫大关联。与所选古诗各占半壁江山的笺文,显现出魏源对诗人之志的理解。其中运用了四种诗歌笺释方法:物象类型、以史证诗、以诗释诗及以文释诗。在运用方法的过程中,存在一些错误观点,比如以诗为史,或认为诗中物物皆有所托喻,乃至穿凿附会等尤需注意。其后,针对魏源有意删改古诗的行为,本文给予一定的批判。认为其行为既不能体现魏源之大胆的取舍气魄,又无助于提升古诗的思想内涵及艺术美,毫不可取。产生有一个半世纪的《诗比兴笺》,接受过程却颇为曲折。其蕴含之价值主要体现在能够继承汉儒以比兴为美刺的说诗传统,注重“以诗为谏”。缺陷与不足同样突出,表现在不合理的删改诗作、注释的瑕疵、著书不严谨等方面。此外,篇末之附录,乃因岳麓书社版《诗比兴笺》在撰写之时及出版过程中产生了一些疏漏,附录于此为之勘正。
[Abstract]:The compilation of poetry anthology was very active in the Ming and Qing dynasties. As one of them, the copyright dispute existed for a long time, and it was only in recent years that it was clarified by Wei Yuan. As the only anthology of ancient poetry which reflects Wei Yuan's poetic concept, "Shi Bi Xing Ji" is a popular poem of the Han, Wei and Tang dynasties, which is recognized by the world and annotated. Compared with other poetry anthology, although the number of poetry selection is small, but quite characteristic. In this paper, the author thinks that Poems by the person is especially concerned about the moral character of the selected poets. This standard of poetry selection is closely related to Wei Yuan's thought of respecting the king and attaching importance to the moral cultivation of literary creators and his own strong patriotism. The notes, which share half of the selected ancient poems, show Wei Yuan's understanding of the poet's aspirations. There are four methods of explaining poems: the types of objects, the historical poems, the poems with poems and the poems with literature. In the process of using the method, there are some wrong views, such as taking poetry as the history, or thinking that the objects in the poem are all figurative, and that even the supplementary meeting should be paid more attention to. After that, this paper criticizes Wei Yuan's behavior of deliberately expunging ancient poems. It is not desirable to think that his behavior can neither reflect Wei Yuan's bold choice nor help to promote the ideological connotation and artistic beauty of ancient poetry. For a century and a half, the process of acceptance was rather tortuous. Its value is mainly reflected in inheriting the tradition of saying poems with Bi Xing as a thorn in Han Confucianism, and paying attention to "taking poems as remonstrations". The defects and shortcomings are also prominent, such as unreasonable deletion of poetry, defects of annotation, unrigorous writing and so on. In addition, the appendix at the end of the article is due to some omissions in the writing and publishing process of Yuelu Book.
【学位授予单位】：江西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I207.22
本文编号：2140088
[Abstract]:The compilation of poetry anthology was very active in the Ming and Qing dynasties. As one of them, the copyright dispute existed for a long time, and it was only in recent years that it was clarified by Wei Yuan. As the only anthology of ancient poetry which reflects Wei Yuan's poetic concept, "Shi Bi Xing Ji" is a popular poem of the Han, Wei and Tang dynasties, which is recognized by the world and annotated. Compared with other poetry anthology, although the number of poetry selection is small, but quite characteristic. In this paper, the author thinks that Poems by the person is especially concerned about the moral character of the selected poets. This standard of poetry selection is closely related to Wei Yuan's thought of respecting the king and attaching importance to the moral cultivation of literary creators and his own strong patriotism. The notes, which share half of the selected ancient poems, show Wei Yuan's understanding of the poet's aspirations. There are four methods of explaining poems: the types of objects, the historical poems, the poems with poems and the poems with literature. In the process of using the method, there are some wrong views, such as taking poetry as the history, or thinking that the objects in the poem are all figurative, and that even the supplementary meeting should be paid more attention to. After that, this paper criticizes Wei Yuan's behavior of deliberately expunging ancient poems. It is not desirable to think that his behavior can neither reflect Wei Yuan's bold choice nor help to promote the ideological connotation and artistic beauty of ancient poetry. For a century and a half, the process of acceptance was rather tortuous. Its value is mainly reflected in inheriting the tradition of saying poems with Bi Xing as a thorn in Han Confucianism, and paying attention to "taking poems as remonstrations". The defects and shortcomings are also prominent, such as unreasonable deletion of poetry, defects of annotation, unrigorous writing and so on. In addition, the appendix at the end of the article is due to some omissions in the writing and publishing process of Yuelu Book.
【学位授予单位】：江西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I207.22
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 唐飞凤;黄建军;;从《诗比兴笺》看魏源的人格之美[J];邵阳学院学报(社会科学版);2016年03期
2 唐飞凤;黄建军;;魏源《诗比兴笺》稿本与刻本之比较[J];邵阳学院学报(社会科学版);2015年05期
3 黄建军;;论魏源《诗比兴笺》的诗学阐释范式[J];求索;2015年07期
4 王辉斌;;陈沆与乐府诗比兴笺释[J];贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版);2014年05期
5 曾凤凰;;《诗比兴笺》对《汉铙歌句解》的继承与批判[J];重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版);2014年09期
6 张建伟;盛寅;;《诗比兴笺》陶渊明诗注评议[J];天中学刊;2014年01期
7 马玉;;《诗比兴笺》与古典诗学的近代转型[J];淮南师范学院学报;2014年01期
8 吴怀东;马玉;;魏源诗学思想与湖湘地域文化——以《诗古微》、《诗比兴笺》为论述中心[J];安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版);2013年01期
9 吴怀东;马玉;;《诗比兴笺》诗学思想与嘉、道之际学术思潮[J];皖西学院学报;2012年06期
10 杨明;;言志与缘情辨[J];上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年01期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 李程;朱彝尊《明诗综》研究[D];华中师范大学;2014年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 翟惠;《清诗别裁集》研究[D];苏州大学;2011年
2 陈海霞;《明诗别裁集》研究[D];江西师范大学;2008年
，本文编号：2140088
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyuyanwenxuelunwen/2140088.html
