《老残游记》实为一部写心之作
[Abstract]:The study of ancient Chinese novels in the modern sense has a history of more than one hundred years. After several generations of scholars' intensive and meticulous works, the author of the novel, the textual research of the edition, the discussion of the style and type of the novel, the interpretation of the text of the novel, the compilation of the history of the novel, Great achievements have been made in the interpretation of novel theory. With the discovery of new literature, the introduction of new theories and methods and the application of new scientific and technological means, there are not only new academic fields and problems, but also the existing academic conclusions need to be re-examined. This column continues to launch the thesis of Professor Liu Yongqiang and Professor Miao Huiming, and makes a deep reflection and deep exploration on the concept, type, criticism and creation of novels. Liu Yongqiang's "Prejudice and misunderstanding in the criticism of Genie novels" probes into the prejudices and misunderstandings of ancient and modern scholars on genie novels, which are embodied in the negation of the ideological connotation of genie novels and the debasement of the description art of geniuses. The art function of genie image is ridiculed, and the prevalence of scientism in modern times has caused the loss of the artistic tradition of genie novels. At the same time, the abuse of romanticism label is also a misunderstanding of genie novel creation method. Miao Huaiming's Journey to Lao can is actually a book about the mind. On the face of it, Miao Huaiming thinks that it is the process of discovering the source of social diseases and exploring the methods of healing and saving the disease among the old disabled, and it is a work of writing the mind, on the face of it, about the traveling life of a traveller, as well as the process of finding out the source of social diseases and exploring the methods of healing and saving the disease. Write Liu E's mental journey. The author reveals that the evil of clean officials has a distinct realistic color and has the meaning of defending himself. The author propagandizes the thought of Taigu School, which is his prescription for curing the disease of society. Several scholars have put forward some new views on some important problems of ancient novels, which may not be the final conclusion, but they will certainly enlighten the researchers of ancient novels and promote the study of ancient novels and their criticism.
【作者单位】: 南京大学文学院;
【分类号】:I207.41
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 唐松波;《老残游记》字法探讨[J];汉字文化;2000年03期
2 张燕;《老残游记》的隐寓手法[J];贵州社会科学;2000年02期
3 温昌经;《老残游记》:老残医治国家疮伤的历程[J];龙岩师专学报;2002年02期
4 彭松乔;生态变相:《老残游记》艺术观照方式解读[J];成都大学学报(社会科学版);2003年03期
5 李红;试论《老残游记》的思想突破[J];工会论坛(山东省工会管理干部学院学报);2005年04期
6 刘鹗;《老残游记》[J];中国残疾人;2005年03期
7 李爱红;;试论《老残游记》中的创新性[J];电影文学;2007年16期
8 李衍妮;吕芹;;《老残游记》中“将”的用法[J];青岛农业大学学报(社会科学版);2007年03期
9 陈今;;《老残游记》音乐描写的独特魅力[J];无锡职业技术学院学报;2008年01期
10 罗曲;查中林;;《老残游记》中“价”字研究[J];剑南文学(经典教苑);2011年10期
相关重要报纸文章 前3条
1 郭延礼;《老残游记》在国外[N];中华读书报;2003年
2 何冀平;这是一次特别的写作,来得霍然,成得怡然[N];中国艺术报;2014年
3 王巨才;眷念与惋叹纠结的乡土之恋[N];文艺报;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前8条
1 周海涛;《老残游记》与山东民俗[D];东北师范大学;2013年
2 陈今;《老残游记》散论[D];南京师范大学;2002年
3 王传军;刘鹗与《老残游记》研究[D];苏州大学;2002年
4 褚超;《老残游记》中的山东镜像研究[D];山东师范大学;2012年
5 徐建秋;对刘鹗以及《老残游记》的文化反思[D];华中科技大学;2005年
6 李莉;新旧之间的文学——《老残游记》[D];湘潭大学;2003年
7 邓辰;学术研究与伦理情感、意识形态的纠结[D];青海师范大学;2012年
8 蔡连卫;《老残游记》对古代小说艺术的整合与革新[D];曲阜师范大学;2003年
,本文编号:2140962
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyuyanwenxuelunwen/2140962.html