当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 中国文学论文 >

“杏坛”传说考辨——兼谈“杏坛”之“杏”决非银杏

发布时间:2019-05-08 18:36
【摘要】:"杏坛"是传说中孔子聚徒讲学的地方。关于其"杏"字所指,目前有两种提法,一说为杏树,一说为银杏,而银杏说在舆论上占据主流。考诸典籍及前人研究成果,"杏坛"原只是一个传说,南朝后学者始将其作为文献典故,并未视为历史实存,真正的"杏坛",为宋金之时所确立,而当时的"杏坛"之"杏"本指杏树,而非银杏。近年来"银杏说"之所以愈演愈烈,除了与《孔子传》这部人物传记为杏坛命名赋予了银杏象征意义,从而造成广泛影响有关外,也与我国兴起的发展银杏经济、宣传银杏文化的浪潮密不可分。纠"银杏"之误传,还"杏坛"本相,可防止继续以讹传讹。
[Abstract]:Xingtan is the legendary place where Confucius gathered and lectured. At present, there are two kinds of references to the word "apricot", one is apricot tree and the other is ginkgo biloba, which occupies the mainstream in public opinion. After the Southern Dynasty, scholars began to regard it as a literature and allusions, and did not regard it as a historical fact. The real "apricot altar" was established in the Song and Jin dynasties, and it was established by the Song and Jin dynasties, "Xingtan" was originally just a legend, and the "apricot altar" was established at the time of the Song and Jin dynasties. And then "apricot altar" apricot "refers to apricot tree, not ginkgo. In recent years, the reason why "Ginkgo Theory" has become more and more fierce is not only related to the symbolic meaning given to Xingtan by the biography of Confucius, which has caused extensive influence, but also to the development of ginkgo economy in our country. The wave of propagandizing ginkgo culture is inextricably linked. Correcting the misstatement of Ginkgo biloba, and also the apricot altar, can prevent the continuation of false transmission.
【作者单位】: 湖南大学岳麓书院;
【基金】:国家社科基金重大项目“中国‘四书’学史”(项目编号:13&ZD060)系列成果之一
【分类号】:I206.2;K22


本文编号:2472138

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyuyanwenxuelunwen/2472138.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户e9d6f***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com