审美判断、合目的性与审美功能系统——兼评牟宗三对康德美学思想的批判

发布时间：2018-01-04 18:18

本文关键词：审美判断、合目的性与审美功能系统——兼评牟宗三对康德美学思想的批判　出处：《濮阳职业技术学院学报》2016年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：康德将合目的性作为审美判断的先验原则,牟宗三反对这种做法并进一步指出,就判断力表现为审美判断而言,判断力担当不了沟通自然和自由两界的职责,甚至两界根本无需判断力来沟通。然而,从功能系统的角度看,审美判断是人在审美活动中借助判断力所下的判断,而人的审美活动是审美主体与审美对象构成的活力系统,其中主体与对象通过反馈机制所达到的适应自稳定性即合目的性。可见,目的论是审美功能系统的本体论根据;用康德的话说,合目的性是审美判断的先验原则。康德对审美判断与合目的性之关系的思考是基于一种功能系统论的视角,而这一视角恰恰是牟宗三所忽视的。
[Abstract]:The purpose of Kant's transcendental principle as aesthetic judgment, Mou Zongsan opposed to this practice and further pointed out that, on the judgment performance for aesthetic judgment, judgment bear communication nature and freedom two community responsibilities, even the two no sense to communicate. However, from the perspective of system function, aesthetic judgment is people with the judgment and the judgement in aesthetic activities, the aesthetic activity of people is a dynamic system composed of the aesthetic subject and aesthetic object, which adapt to the subject and the object achieved by feedback mechanism self stability is purposiveness. Obviously, skopos theory is the system of aesthetic function ontology according to Kant's words; purpose is the transcendental principle of aesthetic judgment. On the relationship between the aesthetic judgment and the purpose of Kant's view on is a functional system based on this perspective it is Mou Zongsan Overlooked.

【作者单位】：华南师范大学公共管理学院;
【分类号】：B83-0
【正文快照】： 一、康德:合目的性是审美判断的先验原则康德在《判断力批判》中区分两种判断力,即规定性判断力和反思性判断力。前者表现出来就是规定知识的判断和规定道德善恶的判断,后者表现出来则为审美判断和目的论的判断。规定知识的判断的先验原则是合规律性,它是知性为认识能力所立的

【相似文献】