“实践美学”的历史地位与现实命运——与杨春时同志商榷

发布时间：2018-01-14 14:09

本文关键词：“实践美学”的历史地位与现实命运——与杨春时同志商榷　出处：《学术月刊》1995年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在中国当代美学中,“实践美学”无疑是最重要的美学主张和理论之一。在这一旗号下,存在着若干个基本主张并不一致的学派。除李泽厚一派外,还有别的学派,譬如蒋孔阳先生的创造论美学学派。以实践论为哲学基础,完全可能以不止一种的方式来展开美学的理论和体系。李泽厚的美学理论不代表“实践美学”的全部,而只是“实践美学”中最有影响的一家(或一派)。李泽厚美学观点的某些不足,并不等于整个“实践美学”的不足。所以,对“实践美学”进行批评,不能只以李泽厚一家的观点为依据。笔者总体上赞同“实践美学”,但是,并不完全赞同李泽厚先生的哲学、美学观点。本文对“实践美学”,包括李泽厚一些重要观点的辩护,并不表明笔者对李泽厚全部观点都赞同,主要想指出某些对“实践美学”的批评的失误与不当。
[Abstract]:In China contemporary aesthetics, practical aesthetics is undoubtedly one of the most important aesthetic propositions. Under this banner, there are several basic ideas is not consistent. In addition to Li Zehou a school, there are other schools, such as Mr Jiang Kongyang's creativity aesthetics school to practice theory as its philosophical foundation. May, in more than one way to expand aesthetic theory and aesthetic theory system. Li Zehou does not represent "Practical Aesthetics", but "practice aesthetics" in the most influential one (or a group). Some shortcomings of Li Zehou aesthetics, lack is not equal to the whole practical aesthetics. So, criticism of "Practical Aesthetics", not only with Li Zehou a view as the basis. The author agrees with the "general practice aesthetics", but not entirely agree with Mr Li Zehou's philosophy, aesthetics of this view. The article's defense of "Practical Aesthetics", including some important points of Li Zehou, does not mean that the author agrees with all the views of Li Zehou. I want to point out some mistakes and misconducts in the criticism of practical aesthetics.

【作者单位】：上海复旦大学中文系
【分类号】：B83-06
【正文快照】： 读了杨春时同志的《走向“后实践美学”》①一文,既感到兴奋,又感到困惑。兴奋的是,这篇文章率先向当代中国最有影响的“实践美学”提出了责难,发起了挑战,并拿出了建构“超越美学”的设想与方案,作者的理论勇气和胆识令人钦敬和佩服;困惑的是,该文许多论点似乎还缺乏深思熟虑

【共引文献】