近三十年来中国美学史写作的维度

发布时间：2018-03-08 23:29

本文选题：中国美学史　切入点：古代天下观　出处：《郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2010年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：新时期以来,美学理论的推进与美学史的重建始终是这一学科的两大核心任务。理论的进步总是激活传统,使其展示出新的样貌和面孔;史的反思则为理论的进展提供支撑和佐证。但是,就30年来美学史研究的实践看,这种理论与历史之间的互动关系是存在严重问题的,它在很大程度上是以特选的中国历史资料来论证西方美学理论的普适性,所谓的中国美学史则成了西方美学"在中国"的历史。这组笔谈,试图暂时搁置美学理论与历史的互动关系,让中国美学史重新回到它独特的历史本身,以使其本土性得到充分凸显。像传统的天下观与中国美学史的整体格局问题,农耕生产方式对于中国美学的奠基问题,审美意识在中国美学史写作中的发展和流变问题,都是还原历史实相的新尝试。同时,也为重构一种更切近中国美学实相的美学史提供了新的可能性。
[Abstract]:Since the new era, the promotion of aesthetic theory and the reconstruction of aesthetic history have always been the two core tasks of this discipline. The reflection of history provides support and evidence for the progress of the theory. However, from the practice of the study of the history of aesthetics over the past 30 years, there are serious problems in the interaction between this theory and history. To a large extent, it demonstrates the universality of western aesthetic theories with specially selected Chinese historical materials. The so-called history of Chinese aesthetics has become the history of western aesthetics "in China." This paper tries to put aside the interactive relationship between aesthetic theory and history, so as to make the history of Chinese aesthetics return to its unique history itself, so as to fully highlight its nativeness, such as the traditional view of the world and the overall pattern of the history of Chinese aesthetics. The foundation of agricultural production mode for Chinese aesthetics, the development and evolution of aesthetic consciousness in the writing of Chinese aesthetic history are all new attempts to restore the historical reality. It also provides a new possibility for reconstructing an aesthetic history which is closer to the reality of Chinese aesthetics.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学哲学与社会学学院;
【分类号】：B83-092

【共引文献】