再论美学本质论及本体论问题——与张伟及王元骧二先生商榷

发布时间：2018-03-17 22:42

本文选题：实践美学　切入点：情本体　出处：《广东社会科学》2012年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：实践论与本体论从来就不是两种思维方式;认识论也不是离得开实践论的独立思维方式。本体论美学把"本体"与"本质"对立起来,并且在把两者的区分进一步绝对化了,把"本体"仅仅看成"是纯逻辑方法进行的范畴的推演"。而是从奎因到海德格尔的语言本体论,不是"当代思维的高度,时代的前沿"。以"情本体"的提出,把李泽厚分为早期的"历史唯物主义"的与后期的历史唯心主义的李泽厚,是不恰当的。无论原教旨实践美学、实践存在论美学还是后实践美学与新实践美学,它们与生命美学、存在主义美学都有一个共同的哲学基础,那就是对包括美感体验、艺术创造等审美范畴在内的作为人的生命存在的本体的诸相关范畴,如实践等,不是从人的实际存在的诸现实关系中最本质的关系——生产关系——出发,而是把这些范畴抽象化为脱离历史的"超越的自由"作为生命存在的本质。
[Abstract]:Practice and ontology have never been two ways of thinking; epistemology is not an independent way of thinking from the theory of practice. Ontology aesthetics opposites "Noumenon" and "essence" and is making the distinction between them more absolute. "Noumenon" is only regarded as a "deduction of the category carried out by pure logical method". It is the linguistic ontology from Quinn to Heidegger, not "the height of contemporary thinking, the frontier of the times". It is inappropriate to divide Li Zehou into early "historical materialism" and later historical idealism. Whether the fundamentalist practical aesthetics, the practical existential aesthetics or the post-practical aesthetics and the new practical aesthetics, They share a common philosophical basis with the aesthetics of life and existentialism, that is, the related categories of the Noumenon as the existence of human life, such as practice, which include aesthetic categories such as aesthetic experience, artistic creation, etc. It is not from the most essential relation of human being's actual existence-the relation of production-but to abstract these categories into "transcendental freedom", which is the essence of the existence of life.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院文学研究所;
【分类号】：B016;B83

【参考文献】