中国美学:从形态出发还是从主义出发

发布时间：2018-04-25 12:23

本文选题：中国美学模式 + 审美形态　；参考：《学术月刊》2011年12期

【摘要】：当代中国存在着美学的美学、主义的美学和形态的美学三种模式。美学的美学大都属于缺乏思想的泛泛之论和名分之争。主义的美学因其步西方美学的后尘而脱离中国审美实际的假、大、空,尤其是其用西方的现代主义和后现代主义切割中国美学和中国审美现象的做法,使得主义越多,距离现实越远,越发混乱。西方的主义已经无法继续作为中国美学立于世界美学之林的出发点。相反,来自对中国传统的、具有识别意义的审美形态的研究,却是中国美学研究真正可靠的出发点。中西在审美形态上存在着很多差异,各有特点,而且往往中国有的审美形态为西方所无。因此,从形态而非主义出发,中国人研究中国美学就不至于跟着西方人走而构造一些不切实际的审美主义的空架子。同样,如果西方人研究中国美学也能做到从中国审美形态出发,那么也就不至于忽视中国美学的存在,从而真正体现世界美学的多样性。从形态出发而非从主义出发研究中国美学,体现了马克思主义美学的方法论。
[Abstract]:There are three modes of aesthetics in contemporary China: aesthetics of aesthetics, aesthetics of doctrine and aesthetics of form. The aesthetics of aesthetics mostly belongs to the general theory of lack of thought and the controversy of distinction. The esthetics of the doctrine deviates from the false, big and empty of the Chinese aesthetic reality because of following the western aesthetics, especially its practice of cutting the Chinese aesthetics and the Chinese aesthetic phenomenon with the western modernism and postmodernism, which makes the doctrine more and more. The farther from reality, the more chaotic. Western doctrine can no longer be regarded as the starting point of Chinese aesthetics in the world aesthetics. On the contrary, the study of Chinese traditional and recognizable aesthetic forms is the real and reliable starting point of Chinese aesthetic research. There are many differences in aesthetic form between China and the West, each has its own characteristics, and some aesthetic forms in China are often absent in the West. Therefore, from the point of view of form rather than doctrine, the Chinese study of Chinese aesthetics will not follow the westerners and construct some empty postures of impractical aestheticism. Similarly, if westerners study Chinese aesthetics from the perspective of Chinese aesthetics, then they will not ignore the existence of Chinese aesthetics and truly reflect the diversity of world aesthetics. The methodology of Marxist aesthetics is embodied in the study of Chinese aesthetics from the point of view of form rather than from doctrine.
【作者单位】：西北师范大学文史学院;
【分类号】：B83-02

【参考文献】